Legal Support for Various Types of Industrial Economic Agents 4.0
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2020-2-55-53-61
Abstract
Introduction. The article describes the existing and potential models of legal regulations between economic agents in Industry 4.0 environment. Conversion of the key production principles and transition to intangible benefits in digital reality сalls for the theoretical rethinking of legal categories.
Materials and methods. The study assumed a positivistic materialism approach and abstract to concrete evolution. The study applied general and specific scientific methods to understand legal phenomena of relations in neo-industrial era: a dialectic method, analysis and synthesis, classification, legal dogmas, comparative, structural and functional methods.
Results. The study found that there are multiple models of legal support to industrial economic agents from special legislation up to the adoption of by-laws, and blending of several approaches. The study confirmed that a particular model is always bases on a chain of relations “producer” “product, work, service” “consumer”. It is recommended to conduct legal studies to regulate activities of economic agents in Industry 4:0 environment grouping them into “developers” and “users”. This grouping should underline specific recommendations, proposals and suggestions to improve various legal mechanisms covering different goals of economic agents, risks, rights, interests and obligations stemming from contracts.
Discussion and conclusion. The study justifies and proves that the efficiency the legislator’s use of a certain of legal regulations depends on the category of subjects of Industry 4.0; Manufacturers; Consumers; Users; Intellectual property; Claw mechanisms to protect rights and legitimate interests. Recipients “developers” and “users”; it also justifies the use of these categories in acts regulating the creation, recording, circulation and deletion of digital cryptographic records in business practice.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. O. InshakovaRussian Federation
Agnessa O.Inshakova, Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor, Chair of Сivil and Private International Law
E. A. Serbina
Russian Federation
Evgenia A.Serbina, master student at Civil and Private International Law department
References
1. Belov V.B., 2016. Novaja paradigma promyshlennogo razvitija Germanii strategija «Industrija 4.0» [Germany’s New Industrial Development Paradigm Industry 4.0 Strategy]. Sovremennaja Evropa [Modern europe]. № 5 (71). P. 11-22.
2. Keshelava A.V., Budanov V.G., Rumjancev V.Ju. i dr., 2017. Vvedenie v «Cifrovuju» jekonomika [Introduction to the Digital Economy]. VNIIGeosistem [VNIIGeosystem]. Moscow.
3. Suhanov E.A., Em V.S., Asoskov A.V. i dr, 2019. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Uchebnik. V 4-h tomah. Tom 1. Obshhaja chast’ [Civil law. Textbook. In 4 volumes. Volume 1. General]. Moscow.
4. Istomina E.A., 2019. Sovremennyj mezhdunarodnyj opyt regulirovanija otnoshenij mezhdu proizvoditeljami v cifrovoj srede [Modern international experience in regulating relations between manufacturers in the digital environment]. Moskovskij jekonomicheskij zhurnal [Moscow Economic Journal]. № 10. P. 460-464.
5. Korshunov N. M., 2017. Intellektual’naja sobstvennost’ (Prava na rezul’taty intellektual’noj dejatel’nosti i sredstva individualizacii): ucheb. Posobie [Intellectual property (Rights to the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization): textbook. allowance]. Moscow.
6. Nesterenko E.A, Kozlova A.S., 2018. Napravlenija razvitija cifrovoj jekonomiki i cifrovyh tehnologij v Rossii [Directions of development of the digital economy and digital technologies in Russia]. Jekonomicheskaja bezopasnost’ i kachestvo [Economic Security and Quality]. № 2 (31). P. 9-14.
7. Turovec Ju.V., Vishnevskij K.O., 2019. Standartizacija cifrovogo proizvodstva: vozmozhnosti dlja Rossii i EAJeS [Standardization of Digital Production: Opportunities for Russia and the EAEU]. Biznes-informatika [Business Informatics]. № 3. P. 78-96.
8. Baron J., Méniére Y., Pohlmann T., 2014. Standards, consortia, and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization. № 36. P. 22-35.
9. Blind K., Mangelsdorf A., 2016. Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation. № 48. P. 13-24.
10. Kagermann H., Lukas W.-D., Wahlster W., 2011. Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution [Industry 4:0: On the Way to the 4th Industrial Revolution Through the Internet of Things]. VDI Nachrichten.
11. Shin D.-H., Kim H., Hwang J., 2015. Standardization revisited: A critical literature review on standards and innovation. Computer Standards & Interfaces. № 38. P. 52-57.
Review
For citations:
Inshakova A.O., Serbina E.A. Legal Support for Various Types of Industrial Economic Agents 4.0. Journal of Law and Administration. 2020;16(2):53-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2020-2-55-53-61