СРАВНИТЕЛЬНОЕ КОНСТИТУЦИОННОЕ ПРАВО: ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ ПРАВА ДРУГИМИ СРЕДСТВАМИ (НЕСКОЛЬКО ЗАРОЖДАЮЩИХСЯ МЫСЛЕЙ)
Аннотация
Список литературы
1. Benedetta Barbisan, The Otherness in Comparative Constitutional Law. How To Teach Comparative Constitutional Law When English Is the Medium of Instruction, 4 Eur. J. Comp. L. & Gov. (2016).
2. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) (Scalia, J., dissenting); Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) (Scalia, J., dissenting); Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1993) (Scalia, J., dissenting). See also Jeremy Waldron, Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 129 (2005).
3. Ernst Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeitder Rechtsvergleichung, in RHEINISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ZIVIL- UND PROZEßRECHT (Konrad Zweigert & Hans-Jürgen Puttfarken eds.) (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1978), at 279-301.
4. Günther Frankenberg, Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals, and Ideology - Toward a Layered Narrative, 4 I-CON 439 (2006), at 441.
5. DANIEL BONILLA MALDONADO, Introduction, in CONSTITUTIONALISM OF THE GLOBAL SOUTH (2014), at 5.
6. RAN HIRSCHL, COMPARATIVE MATTERS. THE RENAISSANCE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2014), at 192-93.
7. Transparency International, ASEAN Integrity Community. A Vision for Transparent and Accountable Integration, April 2015.
8. AMARTYA SEN, DEVELOPMENT AS FREEDOM (1999), at 231.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Барбизан Б. СРАВНИТЕЛЬНОЕ КОНСТИТУЦИОННОЕ ПРАВО: ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ ПРАВА ДРУГИМИ СРЕДСТВАМИ (НЕСКОЛЬКО ЗАРОЖДАЮЩИХСЯ МЫСЛЕЙ). Право и управление. XXI век. 2016;(4):43-48.
For citation:
Barbisan B. COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: A CONTINUATION OF LAW BY OTHER MEANS (A FEW INCIPIENT THOUGHTS). Journal of Law and Administration. 2016;(4):43-48. (In Russ.)