Constitutional identity and institutional autonomy of state
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2021-2-59-33-41
Abstract
Introduction. The article deals with the phenomenon of constitutional identity, which allows strengthening the protection of constitution. The author shows, that the constitutional courts are the creators of the constitutional identity all around the world. That is why its principles may be called «praetorian law», as a reference to Roman judicial practice. The principles of constitutional identity form by themselves a core of constitutional provisions, which guarantee historical continuity and durability of any legal order. A nation can use them to preserve its existence in a legal reality. Constitutional identity creates a subordination of norms in the constitutional text. The most important of them are on the top. Such a vertical system gives to the Constitutional courts a useful criterion for balancing different interests in a society. This criterion is fair enough, because it is stipulated by the constitution itself.
Materials and methods. The materials for the study include the constitutions of states, whose content is related to the problem discussed, decisions of constitutional courts and the legal positions expressed in them, as well as the conclusions of the constitutional and legal doctrine. The study uses the comparative method, which makes it possible to compare homogeneous legal phenomena, the systemic method, with the help of which constitutional identity is considered as an integral part of the mechanism of legal regulation, the dogmatic method that reveals the legal nature of the subject under study, as well as the dialectical method, which gives a holistic idea of subject of research.
Results. Constitutional identity, which determines the hierarchy of constitutional norms and values, characterizes a state, emphasizing its differences from others. Constitutional identity should be unchanged over time and free from ongoing changes to the constitutional text. Then it allows identifying the permanent features of a particular legal order and the state as a whole. Consequently, the principles of constitutional identity preserve the historical heritage of the people, the patterns of its development and a certain predictability of the future. Thus, constitutional identity ensures the continuity of different historical periods.
Discussion and conclusions. According to the author, the application of the principles of constitutional identity can give the current legal order an internal structure, reflected in the text of the Basic Law. At the same time, constitutional norms build a hierarchy that can reflect the hierarchy of significant values. The presence of such a hierarchy expands the possibilities of legal protection of the constitution, since the constitutional courts have a criterion for «weighing» public and private interests.
About the Author
K. V. KarpenkoRussian Federation
Konstantin V. Karpenko, Candidate of Legal Science, Associate Professor at the Department of Constitutional Law
References
1. Bochkarev, S.V., 2018. Razvitie konstitucionalizma vo Francii v poslednej treti XIX v. [The development of constitutionalism in France in last third of XIX s.]. Saint-Petersburg: Asterion.
2. L’identité constitutionnelle saisie par les juges en Europe [The constitutional identity seized by judges in Europe]. 2011. Paris.
3. Jacobsohn, G.J., 2006. An unconstitutional constitution? A comparative perspective. International journal of constitutional law. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 460-487.
4. Karpenko, K.V., 2016. Konstitucionnaya samobytnost' v praktike Konstitucionnogo soveta Francii. [Constitutional identity in jurisprudence of Constitutional council of France]. Mezhdunarodnoe i konstitucionnoe pravo: problemy vzaimovliyaniya. Otv. red. A.A. Dorskaja, S.V. Bochkarev. [International and constitutional law: the issues of mutual influence. Ed. A.A. Dorskaja, S.V. Bochkarev]. Saint-Petersburg, S. 154-169.
5. Karpenko, K.V., 2016. Konstitucionnaya samobytnost' kak rasshirenie predmeta konstitucionnogo prava. [Constitutional identity as an extension of the subject of constitutional law]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Razvitie rossijskogo prava: novye konteksty i poiski resheniya problem». [Proceedings of the international conference «The development of Russian law: new contexts and the search for solutions»]. Moscow, S. 271-277.
6. Lajoinie, T., 2012. Identité constitutionnelle et démocratie en Australie [Constitutional identity and democracy in Australia]. Pouvoirs [Powers]. № 141. P. 17-28.
7. Polovchenko, K.A., 2017. Konstitucionnyj sud kak garant stabil'nosti v «slozhnom» gosudarstve [Constitutional Court as a guarantor of stability in a "complex" state]. – Aktual'nye problemy sravnitel'nogo, zarubezhnogo i rossijskogo konstitucionnogo prava: sb. nauch. trudov. Otv. red. I.A. Rakitskaja. [Pressing issues of comparative, foreign and Russian constitutional law: collected works. Ed. I.A. Rakitskaja]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet. S. 429-447.
8. Polzin, M., 2016. Constitutional identity, unconstitutional amendments and the idea of constituent power: the development of the doctrine of constitutional identity in German constitutional law. International journal of constitutional law. № 14. P. 411-438.
9. Rahmanova, E.N., 2016. O suverenitete gosudarstva v usloviyah globalizacii [On state sovereignty in globalization]. Tipy pravoponimaniya i vyzovy menyayushchegosya mira: sb. nauch. statej. Otv. red. A.A. Dorskaja. [Types of law understanding and challenges in a changing world: collected works. Ed. A.A. Dorskaja]. Saint-Petersburg, S. 115-118.
10. Shashkova, A.V., 2018. Procedura rassmotreniya dela v Konstitucionnom sude Italii [Constitutional procedure in the Constitutional court of Italy]. Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve [Gaps in Russian legislation]. № 2. S. 20-22.
11. Shashkova, A.V., 2017. Evolyuciya konstitucionnogo pravosudiya v Ispanii [Evolution of constitutional justice in Spain]. Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo [Constitutional and municipal law]. № 10. S. 62-64.
12. Vojtovich, E.A., 2018. Osobennosti konstitucionno-pravovogo statusa glavy gosudarstva v Avstralijskom Sodruzhestve [Features of the constitutional status of the Head of state in Australia]. Aktual'nye voprosy konstitucionnogo prava: sb. nauch. statej. Otv. red. I.A. Rakitskaja [Pressing issues of constitutional law: collected works. Ed. I.A. Rakitskaja]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet. S. 63-81.
13. Vojtovich, E.A., 2019. Osobennosti prekrashcheniya polnomochij parlamenta Avstralijskogo Soyuza [Legal issues of early dissolution of the parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia]. Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal [Eurasian law journal]. № 7. S. 83-86.
14. Śledzińska-Simon, A., 2015. Constitutional identity in 3D: A model of individual, relational, and collective self and its application in Poland. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 13. № 1. P. 124–155.
Review
For citations:
Karpenko K.V. Constitutional identity and institutional autonomy of state. Journal of Law and Administration. 2021;17(2):33-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2021-2-59-33-41