The Phenomenon of "Managed Global Competition" and the Interests of Russia: New Competition in the Arctic Region

Introduction. The authors are analyzing a new stage in the formation of 21st century world order, characterized by active policy of great powers - the United States, China, Russia, and other major powers. Primary attention is given to the U.S. strategy which the authors define as “governing (programming) strategy” aimed to influence (determine, program) policies and development of Russia and China who are declared to be primary challenges to the United States and their global competitors. The specified activities of the United States are considered in the article on the example of the Arctic region, which is becoming a space of intense competition between leading powers and a number of middle-level countries. Activities of China and Japan are described for better understanding of the situation in the Arctic. The Arctic has vital importance for the Russian Federation, and loss of privileged position can have serious consequences for the status and capabilities of Russia in the world.

Materials and methods. The theoretical basis of the study is structural realism. Not only the United States, but also other powers determine the institutional foundations of the emerging order, transforming old and forming new institutions, which is especially important for the Arctic. The methodological basis of the study is systemic approach, comparative and issuehistoric analysis.

Research results. Since 2021 the United States have begun a large-scale and multi-level strategy of constructing liberal world order aimed to deter and overplay Russia and China in global influence. In the framework of this strategy the Arctic region is of great importance as future role of the Russian Federation and the PRC to a great extent depends on their status in the Arctic.

 Discussion and conclusion. The authors worked out new definitions of “world order” and “managed competition” that are essential for understanding contemporary international situation, American global programming strategy, prospects for Russia in world politics and in the Arctic.

1. Aleksandrov O.B., 2015. Perspektivy strategicheskogo al'iansa Rossii i Kitaia v Arktike [Prospects for a Strategic Alliance Between Russia and China in the Arctic]. Rossiia – XXI vek [Russia XXI Century], № 2. P. 24-35.

2. Antiushina N.M., 2014. Arktika: novyi format mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [Arctic: a New Format of International Cooperation]. Moscow, 138 p.

3. Bekyashev D.K., Bekyashev K.A. 2021.Tendentsii razvitiya pravovogo rezhima Severnogo morskogo puti [The trends in the development of the legal regime of the Northern Sea Route]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. [Journal of Saint-Petersburg University. Law]. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 276-295.

4. Bogaturov A.D., 1996. Velikie derzhavy na Tikhom okeane. Istoriia i teoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v Vostochnoi Azii posle Vtoroi mirovoi voiny (1945–1995) [Great Powers in the Pacific Ocean. History and Theory of International Relations in East Asia after World War II (1945-1995)]. Moscow.

5. Voronkov L., Smirnova A. 2017. Arkticheskiy sovet kak mezhdunarodnaya organizatsiya novogo tipa [The Arctic council as an international organization of a new type]. Mezhdunarodnaya analitika [International Analysis]. № 3. P. 7-16.

6. Gudev P. 2020. Severnyy morskoy put’: perspektivy legitimizatsii natsional’nogo statusa v ramkah mezhdunarodnogo prava (chast’ 2) [The Northern Sea Route: Problems of National Status Legitimization under International Law. Part 2]. Arktika i Sever [Arctica and North]. № 41. P. 130-147.

7. Gutenev M.Yu. 2019. Arktika vo vneshney politike SShA [The Arctic in the US Foreign Policy]. Oykumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya [Oecumene. Regional Studies]. № 2. P. 133-143.

8. Daniuk N.S., Ramazanov M.R., 2014. Arktika v sisteme koordinatsii energeticheskoi politiki RF i KNR kak osnova ustoichivogo razvitiia rossiisko-kitaiskikh otnoshenii [The Arctic in the System of Coordination of the Energy Policy of the Russian Federation and the PRC as the Basis for the Sustainable Development of Russian-Chinese Relations]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo [International Public and Private Law]. № 2. P. 15-22.

9. Zhuravel V.P. 2021. K voprosu o predsedatel’stve Rossii v Arkticheskom sovete [Revisiting Russian Presidency in the Arctic Council]. Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik IE RAN [Scientific-Analytical Bulletin of the IE RAS]. № 3. P. 62-68.

10. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A., 2012. Osvoenie prirodnykh resursov Arktiki: puti sotrudnichestva Rossii sKitaem v interesakh budushchego [Development of Natural Resources in the Arctic: Ways of Cooperation Between Russia and China in the Interests of the Future]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' [National Interests: Priorities and Security]. № 39. P. 2-9.

11. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. 2018. Rossiysko-amerikanskie otnosheniya v Arktike: sotrudnichestvo ili sopernochestvo [U.S.-Russia Relations In the Arctic: Cooperation Or Competition?]. Mirovaya ekonomika I mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations]. Vol. 62. № 9. P. 103-111.

12. Kurmazov A., 2015. Arkticheskaia politika Iaponii i interesy Rossii [Arctic Policy of Japan and the Interests of Russia]. Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka [Problems of the Far East]. № 3. P. 58–67.

13. Megatrendy. Osnovnye traektorii evoliutsii mirovogo poriadka v XXI veke [Megatrends. The Main Trajectories of the Evolution of the World Order in the XXI Century]. Pod red. Shakleinoi T.A., Baikova A.A. Izdanie tret'e, ispravlennoe, dopolnennoe i pererabotannoe. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2022. 536 p.

14. Strel'tsov D.V., 2017. Politika Iaponii v Arktike [Japan's Policy in the Arctic]. Sravnitel'naia politika [Comparative Politics]. № 8(1). Р. 93-103. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-1-93-103.

15. Torkunov A.V., 2019. Strategiia administratsii Trampa v Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom regione [The Trump Administration Strategy in the Asia-Pacific Region]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia [World Economy and International Relations]. Vol. 63. № 6. P. 25–37.

16. Troitskii M.A., 2002. Kontseptsiia «programmiruiushchego liderstva» v evroatlanticheskoi strategii SShA [The Concept of "Programming Leadership" in the US Euro-Atlantic Strategy]. Pro et Contra [Pro et Contra]. Vol. 7. № 4. P. 86-103.

17. Shakleina T.A., 2019. «Dilemma Ameriki» v formirovanii sovremennogo mirovogo poriadka. Rezul'taty deistvii SShA i formirovanie «evraziiskogo tsentra» [America's Dilemma" in the Formation of the Modern World Order. The Results of US Actions and the Formation of a "Eurasian Center"]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Processes]. Vol. 17. № 4. P. 36-48.

18. Shakleina T.A., 2021. Novyi etap v formirovanii mirovogo poriadka. Plany SShA po upravleniiu mezhderzhavnoi konkurentsiei [A New Stage in the Formation of the World Order. US Plans for Managing Interstate Competition]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Processes]. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 6-22.

19. Bacevich A.J., 2018. Twilight of the American Century. Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press. 493 p.

20. Challenge and Change. Global Threats and the State in Twenty-First Century International Politics. N.C. Noonan, V. Nadkarni, eds. Macmillan, 2016.

21. Mearsheimer, John, 2018. The Great Delusion. Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

22. Russia and the United States in the Evolving World Order. Torkunov A., Noonan N., Shakleina T. (eds.) Moscow: MGIMO-University, 2018.