International Cooperation of BRICS Countries in the Field of Forced Migration: Topical Issues and Prospectives

Introduction. International law acts of BRICS countries enshrine their attachment to enforcement of the international cooperation in the field of population, in particular migration. The rise in the number of forced migrants on their territories as well the accession of new States to BRICS explains the topicality of the research into the particularities and prospects of BRICS countries’ cooperation in the sphere of forced migration. Meanwhile the international law acts adopted by BRICS countries do not enshrine their unified position as regards general principles of their cooperation in the sphere of forced migration.

Materials and Methods. The conciliation theory according to which creation of international law norms results from the reconciliation of international legal position of its subjects serves as the theoretical framework for the present research. While exercising autonomous international legal policy, each State aims at enshrining the principles of its foreign policy in the international law acts. International legal positions of States are enshrined in their treaties, national legislation and unilateral acts. The article contains the results of a comprehensive comparative analysis of international legal positions of BRICS countries as regards international law norms governing the legal status of forced migrants. The subject of the research includes universal treaties, BRICS countries’ international law acts, national legislation and unilateral acts.

Results. BRICS is an intergovernmental institution, which is not de jure an international organisation. The acts adopted by BRICS countries are joint unilateral acts enshrining their unified positions on international law. International cooperation of BRICS countries in the sphere of forced migration is based on principles of rule of international law and multilateralism as well as their coincident and similar positions on interpretation and application of international law norms governing the legal status of forced migrants. BRICS international law acts enshrine the international law concepts applicable to the international cooperation in the field of forced migration.

Discussion and Conclusions. Conciliation of international law positions of BRICS countries as regards interpretation and application of international law concepts of “durable solution to the problem of forced migrants”, “responsibility sharing”, “solidarity”, “common but differentiated responsibility” as well as other international law concepts upon which the international cooperation in the field of forced migration is based should be considered a prospective area of their international cooperation.

1. Vylegzhanin A. N., Magomedova O. S., 2022. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaja politika gosudarstva. Sovremennye koncepcii [International Legal Policy of a State. Modern Concepts]. Mezhdunarodnye processy [International Trends]. Volume 20. No. 3. P. 112-126.

2. Gukepshev A. A., 2023. Pravovoe regulirovanie vneshnego izmerenija Obshhej evropejskoj sistemy ubezhishha: sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija [Legal Regulation of the External Dimension of the Common European Asylum System: current state and future perspectives]. Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. No. 1. P. 95-110.

3. Ivanov D. V., Tarasyants E. V., 2009. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo zashhity i pooshhrenija prav cheloveka: proshloe, nastojashhee i budushhee (Chast' 1) [The International Law of Protection and Promotion of Human Rights: Past, Present and Future (Part I)]. Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. No. 1. P. 35-50.

4. Kiseleva E. V., 2017. Vremennaja i dopolnitel'naja zashhita po sovremennomu mezhdunarodnomu pravu [Complementary forms of protection in contemporary international law]. Jelektronnoe setevoe izdanie «Mezhdunarodnyj pravovoj kur'er» [Electronic Journal “International Legal Courier”]. No. 1. P. 16-20.

5. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava v 6 t. [Course on International Law in 6 vol.] Vol. 1., 1967. Moscow.

6. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava v 7 t. [Course on International Law in 7 vol.] Vol. 1., 1989. Moscow.

7. Tunkin G. I., 2016. Teorija mezhdunarodnogo prava [Theory of International Law]. Moscow.

8. Shibaeva E. A., 1986. Pravo mezhdunarodnyh organizacij. Voprosy teorii [Law of International Organisations. Theoretical Aspects]. Moscow.

9. Shugurov M. V., 2015. Perspektivy razvitija koncepcii mezhdunarodno-pravovoj politiki. Chast' 2 [Perspectives of development of conception of international law policy. Part 2]. Rossijskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnyh issledovanij [Russian Journal of Legal Studies]. Volume 2. No. 3. P. 196-204.

10. Chernichenko S. V., 2014. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava. Obshhie voprosy [Contours of International Law. General Aspects.]. Moscow.

11. Yastrebova A. Yu., 2019. Zashhita vynuzhdennyh migrantov v uslovijah vooruzhennyh konfliktov: mezhdunarodnopravovye aspekty [Protecting forced migrants in armed conflicts: international legal aspects]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti [Pathways to Peace and Security]. Volume 56. No. 1. P. 74-82.

12. Yastrebova A. Yu., 2022. Otdel'nye podhody k sisteme special'nyh principov mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava: soderzhanie i jevoljucija [Particular Approaches to the System of International Humanitarian Law Special Principles: Substance and Evolution]. Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. No. 3. P. 6-18.

13. Abashidze A., Solntsev A., Kiseleva E., 2016. Legal status of BRICS and some trends of International cooperation. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. Vol. 9. No. 36. P. 1-9.

14. Cantor D. et al., 2022. Externalisation, access to territorial asylum, and international law. International Journal of Refugee Law. Volume 34. No. 1. P. 120-156.

15. Dowd R., McAdam J., 2017. International cooperation and responsibility-sharing to protect refugees: what, why and how? International & Comparative Law Quarterly. Volume 66. No. 4. P. 863-892.

16. Duff A., 2008. Expulsion to face torture? Non-refoulement in international law. International Journal of Refugee Law. Volume 20. No. 3. P. 373-390.

17. Geiger M., Kokoeva N., Zhang Y., 2022. The International Organization for Migration (IOM): “Competent Structure” and “Inevitable Choice” for Russia and China to Aff Global Migration Governance? Journal of International Analytics. Volume 13. No. 1. P. 48-65.

18. Goodwin-Gill G. S., McAdam J., 2011. The Refugee in International Law. Third Edition. Oxford.

19. Hovil L., Maple N., 2022. Local integration: A durable solution in need of restoration? Refugee Survey Quarterly. Volume 41. No. 2. P. 238-266.

20. Ivanov D. V., Pchelitseva V. V., 2023. Durable Solution to the Problem of Externally Displaced Persons from the Syrian Arab Republic in OIC Member States: Legal Obligations and International Cooperation with UNHCR, EU and OIC. European Journal of Migration and Law. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 31-53.

21. Martynov B., 2016. BRICS' Perspectives on International Law. International Trends. Volume 2. No. 2. P. 25-34.

22. Novoselova M., 2017. BRICS: dialectics of unity and diversity as a key to successful global cooperation. BRICS Law Journal. Volume 4. No. 4. P. 145-151.

23. Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India, 1947-2000. 2nd Ed. 2008. Sage Publications.

24. Sen S., 2015. Understanding India’s Refusal to Accede to the 1951 Refugee Convention: Context and Critique. Refugee Review: Re-conceptualizing Refugees and Forced Migration in the 21st Century. Volume 131.

25. Shaw M. N., 2003. International Law. 5th Ed. Cambridge.

26. The rise of the BRICS in the global political economy: changing paradigms? Ed. V. I. Lo, M. Hiscock,. 2014. Edward Elgar Publishing.

27. Ziero G. W., 2015. Looking for a BRICS perspective on international law. Brazilian Journal of International Law. Volume 12. P. 303-322.