Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

International Legal Content of the Concept "Renewable Energy Sources" Revisited

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-1-70-120-135

Abstract

Introduction. The expansion of the use of renewable energy sources (RES) is recognized as one of the means to solve the issue of climate change. At the same time, RES is considered an "antagonist" to traditional natural resources, the latter being unevenly distributed among states, so the formation of an international legal regime for renewable energy requires a balanced approach. In this article, the author analyzes the key component of such a regime, namely, the legal content of the term "renewable energy sources". Based on the documents adopted within international organizations containing definitions of RES, the author establishes the main criteria of RES and formulates a list of energy sources that are universally recognized as such, namely, wind energy, water energy, solar energy, biomass energy, geothermal energy, ocean and river energy.
Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the research was formed by general scientific techniques (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, classification, systematization, forecasting) and private scientific techniques (formal legal and comparative legal method).
The research is based on the documents of universal international organizations (UN, IEA, IRENA), in which the definition of RES is formulated. The author also resorts to the sources of the EU law governing cooperation in the area of renewable energy as well as documents adopted within the CIS.
Research results. The article analyzes the concept of RES in the international law. It is established that it is based on a quantitative criterion (i.e. the speed of reproduction of an energy source should exceed the speed of its consumption) and a qualitative one (its "sustainability" in terms of environmental impact). Since no known energy source is completely environmentally neutral, the "sustainability" criterion is used to identify sources that have significantly less environmental impact than others. The author also identifies a number of energy sources that meet the criterion of renewability, but are not recognized as RES (e.g. nuclear energy), or are not included in the RES, in respect of which states wish to develop international cooperation (e.g. certain types of hydropower, traditional biomass). The author also identifies RES, with regards to which states choose to apply the precautionary principle due to insufficient knowledge of their compliance with the sustainability criterion (e.g. geothermal energy).
Discussion and conclusion. The author concludes that the international community has developed an understanding of the criteria for classifying energy sources as RES, and their list is agreed within different interstate communities depending on the actual needs of interaction (for universal organizations, the aim is to mainly the exchange of "best practices" for encouraging RES, for regional ones it also includes developing cooperation mechanisms within the framework of transnational projects and harmonization of state laws). This gives grounds for optimism about reaching a consensus on the concept of renewable energy for the development of an international legal regime.

About the Author

M. A. Milyukova
MGIMO-University
Russian Federation

Maria A. Milyukova, applicant of the Department of International Law

Moscow



References

1. Vasilenko E.V., 2012. O nekotoryh pravovyh aspektah mezhdunarodnogo upravlenija prirodnymi resursami [Some Legal Issues in Natural Resources’ International Management]. Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. № 1. Р. 255-269.

2. Vylegzhanin A.N., Zilanov V.K., 2000. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy upravlenija morskimi zhivymi resursami. Teorija i dokumenty [International legal framework for the management of marine living resources. Theory and documents]. Moscow.

3. Adamantiades A., Kessides I., 2009. Nuclear power for sustainable development: Current status and future prospects. Energy Policy. Vol. 37. Issue 12. P. 5149-5166.

4. Benvenisti E., 2008. Asian Traditions and Contemporary International Law on the Management of Natural Resources. Chinese Journal of International Law. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 273-283.

5. Breeze P., 2014. Geothermal Power. Power Generation Technologies. Ed. by Breeze P. Elsevier Science.

6. Brown L.R., Flavin Chr., Postel S., 2012. Picturing a Sustainable Society: State of the World. Worldwatch Institute, 1990, cited in Tester J.W. Sustainable Energy: Choosing Among Options. 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

7. Cohen B.L., 1983. Breeder Reactors: A Renewable Energy Source. American Journal of Physics. Vol. 51.

8. Crossley P., 2019. Renewable Energy Law: An International Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Elliott D., 2007. Sustainable Energy: Nuclear Power and Renewables. Sustainable Energy: Opportunities and Limitations, Energy, Climate and Environment Series. Ed. by D. Elliott. Palgrave MacMillan.

10. Gerrard M.B., 2011. The Law of Clean Energy: Efficiency and Renewables. Faculty Books. Chicago, IL, American Bar Association. Vol. 61.

11. Goldstein B., Budd A., 2008. Hot rocks in Australia-national outlook. Proceedings Thirty-Third Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University. Stanford, California. January 28-30.

12. Gritsevskyi A., 2016. Renewable vs. Non-renewable Energy Sources, Forms and Technologies. UN Statistical Commission. URL: https://unstats.un.org.

13. Grubert E., Hastings-Simon S., 2022. Designing the mid-transition: a review of medium-term challenges for coordinated decarbonization in the United States. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change. Vol. 13. Issue 3.

14. Harrison S., 2011. Geothermal Resources. In: Gerrard M.B. The Law of Clean Energy: Efficiency and Renewables. Faculty Books. Chicago, IL, American Bar Association. Vol. 61.

15. Kammen D.M., 2004. Renewable Energy, Taxonomic Overview. Encyclopedia of Energy. Ed. by Cleveland C.J. Elsevier Science. Vol. 5. P. 388.

16. Kochan D.J., Grant T., 2007. In the Heat of the Law, It's Not Just Steam: Geothermal Resources and The Impacts on Thermophile Biodiversity. Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. Vol. 13.

17. Kozloff K.L. and Dower R.C., 1993. A New Power Base - Renewable Energy Policies for the Nineties and Beyond. World Resources Institute.

18. Lip-Wah H., 2016. Wind energy in Malaysia: Past, present and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol. 53. Issue C. P. 279-295.

19. Rothwell D.R., Stephens T., 2010. The International Law of the Sea. Hart Publishing.

20. Smith E.E., 2007. Wind Energy: Siting Controversies and Rights in Wind. Environmental & Energy Law & Policy Journal. Vol. 1. Issue 2. P. 281-318.

21. Sobenes E., Mead S., Samson S., 2022. The Environment Through the Lens of International Courts and Tribunals. Springer.

22. Tester J.W., 2012. Sustainable Energy: Choosing Among Options. 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

23. UNEP Handbook for Drafting Laws on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Resources. Ed. by Ottinger R.L. and Bradbrook A.J. UNEP. Earth Print Limited, 2007.

24. Vylegzhanin A., Ivanov D., Milyukova M., 2023. Renewable Energy in International Law: The Russian Perspective for Developing a Common BRICS Approach. BRICS Law Journal. Vol. 10(2). P. 5-36.


Review

For citations:


Milyukova M.A. International Legal Content of the Concept "Renewable Energy Sources" Revisited. Journal of Law and Administration. 2024;20(1):120-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-1-70-120-135

Views: 138


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)