Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

The Need of Criteria Development for Health Care Startups for Public Policy

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-2-71-129-139

Abstract

Introduction. The study examines the role of public administration in the development of innovations in healthcare as a promising sector of the economy. The focus of the work is on analyzing one of the ways to increase the effectiveness of such an instrument of state innovation policy as startup development management. In order to systematically provide targeted support to these subjects, it is necessary to study and analyze the criteria of startups. Their legislative enshrinement will make it possible to increase the degree of compliance of the state support measures with the requests of these organizations and optimize the spending of budget funds.

Materials and methods. Materials and methods. The works of such foreign authors as S. Knack, F. Kiefer, M. Olson, P.E. Samuelson, R. Layard, C. Catacorpi and J-P. Knack, F. Keefer, M. Olson, P.E. Samuelson, R. Layard, K. Katakorpi and J.P. Laamanen, D. Anomali, L.M. Shen, D. Keeble, G. Goodguin. Laamanen, D. Anomali, L.M. Shen, D. Keeble, G. Goodgin, E. Freeman, D. Reed, N. Carter, Y. Cho, G. McLean, E. Rees, M. Crezzi, P. Paoloni, T. Veblen, W.C. Mitchell, D.M. Clark and D. Commons, as well as domestic scholars such as E.V. Aristov, D.O. Tarabara, I.V. Raeva, P.A. Sataev and K.A. Soloveichik. Their methodological basis was supported by data from statistical documents and strategies of WHO, IMF, OECD, ECB, Global Health Investment Fund (GHIF).

The study is based on the approaches of the economic school of institutionalists who emphasize the special role of the environment and institutions that have a direct impact on it in public administration, and is also based on research on the provision of public goods. The following general scientific methods were applied in the work: analysis, synthesis, system and functional approaches.

Research results. The study analyzed the genesis of the formation of the need to legislate the concept of a startup and its criteria. The adoption of the relevant regulatory legal acts in Russia has created conditions for the creation of a unified register of small technology companies and seamless implementation of targeted measures to support innovation activities.

Discussion and conclusion. Further development for the realization of the innovative potential of the healthcare sector is possible through the finalization of the existing legislation. Proposals to make medical technology companies a separate category may form the basis for potential measures aimed at supporting small medical technology companies. This will allow to systematically develop targeted measures to support them and better meet the specifics of their needs.

About the Authors

M. I. Ivanova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Maria I. Ivanova, Ph.D. in Politics, Senior Lecturer, Deputy Head of the Department of Public Administration 

Moscow



D. I. Zhuchkov
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Denis I. Zhuchkov, bachelor's degree graduate, the School of Governance and Politics

Moscow



References

1. Antuykhova E.A., Talagaeva D.A., 2023. Innovacionnaja politika v dejatel'nosti OJeSR: istoricheskaja rekonstrukcija na neogramshianskih osnovanijah [Innovation Policy in OECD Activities: A Historical Reconstruction on Neo-Gramscian Foundations]. Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific Dialogue]. Volume 12. № 10. S. 265-287.

2. Aristov E.V., 2016. Obshhestvennye blaga: koncepcija i konstitucionno-pravovaja harakteristika [Public Goods: Concept and Constitutional and Legal Characterization]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Perm University. Legal Sciences]. № 2 (32). S. 149-157.

3. Zav'jalova E.B., Shumskaya E.I., 2019. Put' «naverstyvanija» i put' innovacionnogo razvitija: kakov budet vybor Rossii? [The Path of "Catching Up" and the Path of Innovative Development: What Will Be Russia's Choice?]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Jekonomika [Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Economics]. Volume 27. № 4. S. 743-752.

4. Ivanova M.I., 2021. Rekomendatel'nye sistemy v gosudarstvennom upravlenii: mezhdunarodnyj opyt [Recommendation systems in public administration: international experience]. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative economy]. Volume 15. № 9. S. 3491-3504.

5. Pavlyuk A.V., Zhuchkov D.I., Batyukhnova E.A., 2023. Rol' pravovogo regulirovanija ICO v razvitii malyh tehnologicheskih kompanij v ramkah innovacionnoj jekonomiki (sravnitel'no-pravovoj analiz Rossii i Singapura) [The Role of ICO Legal Regulation for Tech-Startups’ Development within the Innovation Economy (Comparative Legal Analysis of Russia and Singapore)]. Problemy ekonomiki i juridicheskoj praktiki [Problems of economics and legal practice]. Volume 19. № 6. S. 138-144.

6. Tarabara D.O., 2022. Problemy pravovogo regulirovanija startapov v Rossijskoj Federacii v kontekste aktual'nyh meroprijatij obrazovatel'noj politiki [Problems of Legal Regulation of Startups in the Russian Federation in the Context of Current Educational Policy Activities]. International & Domestic Law: Materialy XVI Ezhegodnoj mezhdunarodnoj konferencii po nacional'nomu i mezhdunarodnomu pravu [International & Domestic Law: Proceedings of the XVI Annual International Conference on National and International Law]. S. 301-304.

7. Shumskaya E.I., Zhuchkov D.I., Ivanov S.Y., 2023. O voprosah finansirovanija nauchnyh issledovanij v Rossijskoj Federacii [Funding Scientific Research in the Russian Federation]. Gosudarstvennoe i municipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski [State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes]. № 1. S. 49-53.

8. Audretsch D.B., Acs Z.J., 1994. New-firm startups, technology, and macroeconomic fluctuations. Small Business Economics. Volume 6. № 6. P. 439-449.

9. Bosque Ortiz G., Hsiang W., 2018. Medical Technology. Yale J Biol Med. Volume 91. № 3. P. 203-205.

10. Ehsan Zaeem-Al, 2021. Defining a Startup A Critical Analysis. SSRN.

11. Flessa S., Huebner C., 2021. Innovations in Health Care A Conceptual Framework. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. Volume 18. №19.

12. Keynes J.M., 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

13. Nanda R., Matthew R.-K., 2013. Investment cycles and startup innovation. Journal of Financial Economics. Volume 110. №2. P. 403-418.

14. North, Douglass C., 1991. Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. Volume 5. № 1. P. 97-112.

15. Rocha J.A.O., Zavale G.J.B., 2021. Innovation and Change in Public Administration. Open Journal of Social Sciences. Volume 9. № 6. P. 285-297.

16. Sreenivasan, A. and Suresh, M., 2022. Future of healthcare start-ups in the era of digitalization: bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Volume 4. №1/2, P. 1-18.


Review

For citations:


Ivanova M.I., Zhuchkov D.I. The Need of Criteria Development for Health Care Startups for Public Policy. Journal of Law and Administration. 2024;20(2):129-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-2-71-129-139

Views: 142


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)