Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

Extraterritoriality of the Application of Constitutional Norms in the USA: a View from a Constitutional and Legal Perspective

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-4-73-38-49

Abstract

Introduction. The problem of extraterritoriality of the application of American law and, in particular, constitutional norms has become especially relevant in recent decades in connection with the adoption and application of a number of regulations whose effect extends directly beyond the borders of the United States and significantly affects the interests of independent states. In this regard, scholars and legal practitioners often turn to this issue to determine what is the legal basis for the application of extraterritoriality, as well as what judicial and doctrinal approaches to resolving this issue exist in the United States of America itself. It should be noted that some states understand the principle of extraterritoriality very broadly, when a state goes beyond its own jurisdiction. A similar situation is observed in the United States. In this article, authors turn to the history of the extraterritoriality of legal norms in the United States, analyze in detail the practice of the Supreme Court and identify different vectors of development of this concept in American law and judicial practice.

Materials and methods. During the study, general scientific methods were used, including methods of cognition, description, analysis and special methods, such as comparative legal, formal legal, structural legal.

Reseach results. The study showed that despite the long history of resolving the issue of extraterritoriality of a number of American legal norms, the vector of development of this concept has changed significantly over time, which is directly confirmed by the corresponding analysis of the practice of the US Supreme Court and a number of lower courts. The modern trend is to use more balanced approaches that take into account a variety of factors, such as the territory of the act and the citizenship of the party.

Discussion and conclusion. The conducted research revealed that increasing attention is being paid to the analysis of the issue of the balance of power in the system of separation of powers, as well as to issues of national security in connection with the development of the concept of extraterritoriality. The development of the judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the United States has a significant impact on the activities of executive authorities and affects the standards for resolving judicial disputes in lower courts. When resolving the issue of extraterritoriality, it is very important to maintain modern diplomatic approaches and, in particular, to maintain the principle of reciprocity and not to create a threat to the sovereignty of other states.

About the Authors

E. A. Kremyanskaya
MGIMO-University under the MFA of Russia
Russian Federation

Elena A. Kremyanskaya, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Constitutional Law Chair

Moscow



T. O. Kuznetsova
MGIMO-University under the MFA of Russia
Russian Federation

Tamara O. Kuznetsova, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Constitutional Law Chair

Moscow



References

1. Bernam Uil'yam, 2016. Pravovaya sistema Soyedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki [The Legal System of the United States of America]. Moscow.

2. Orlov A.G., Slavkina N.A., 2015. Institut grazhdanstva v zarubezhnykh stranakh [The Institute of Citizenship in Foreign Countries]. Moscow.

3. Kremyanskaya E.A., 2024. Konstitutsionnoye pravo Soyedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki [Constitutional Law of the United States of America]. Moscow.

4. Rakitskaya I.A., Leybo YU.I., Pavlov Ye.Ya., 2019. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy mekhanizm primeneniya norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v zarubezhnykh stranakh [Constitutional and Legal Mechanism for the Application of International Law in Foreign Countries]. Moscow.

5. Kremyanskaya E.A et all.; 2023. Konstitutsionno-pravovyye osnovy regulirovaniya ekonomicheskikh i politicheskikh sanktsiy v zarubezhnykh stranakh [Constitutional and legal foundations for regulating economic and political sanctions in foreign countries]. Moscow.

6. Karpenko K.V., 2021. Printsip konstitutsionnoy samobytnosti (identichnosti) i institutsional'naya avtonomiya gosudarstva [The principle of constitutional originality (identity) and institutional autonomy of the state]. Pravo i upravleniye. XXI vek [Journal of Law and Administration]. № 2(59).

7. Kremyanskaya Ye.A., Leybo Yu.I., 2018. Konstitutsionno-pravovyye i vneshnepoliticheskiye aspekty ekonomicheskikh sanktsiy SSHA [Constitutional, legal and foreign policy aspects of US economic sanctions]. Pravo i upravleniye. XXI vek [Journal of Law and Administration]. № 4(49).

8. Kremyanskaya E.A., 2020. Konstitutsionno-pravovyye osnovy vneshney politiki Soyedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki [Constitutional and legal foundations of the foreign policy of the United States of America]. Konstitutsionno-pravovyye osnovy vneshney politiki v zarubezhnykh stranakh: Kollektivnaya monografiya v chest' professora, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk Ye.Ya.Pavlova, Liber amicorum. [Constitutional and legal foundations of foreign policy in foreign countries: Collective monograph in honor of professor, doctor of law E.Ya.Pavlov, Liber amicorum]. Ed. by I.A. Rakitskaya. Moscow.

9. Friedman Lawrence, 1992. Vvedeniye v amerikanskoye pravo [Introduction to American Law]. Moscow.

10. Samarin A.A., 2016. Eksterritorial'noye deystviye prava [Extraterritorial effect of law]. Avtoref. Dissertatsii na soiskaniye uch.step. k.yu.n., [Abstract of a dissertation for the degree of candidate of legal sciences]. N. Novgorod.

11. Fallon Richard H., Jr., 2019. The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

12. Hartman Gary R., Roy M. Mersky, Cindy L. Tate, 2004. Landmark Supreme Court Cases: The Most Influential Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, NY.

13. Neuman, G.L., 1996. Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law. Princeton University Press.

14. Popelier P., Sahadžić M., 2019. Constitutional Asymmetry in Multinational Federalism. Federalism and Internal Conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

15. Stephens, Otis H., Jr., Scheb, John M., II, Glennon, Colin, 2008. American Constitutional Law. Vol. 1. Thomson Wadsworth Publishing House.


Review

For citations:


Kremyanskaya E.A., Kuznetsova T.O. Extraterritoriality of the Application of Constitutional Norms in the USA: a View from a Constitutional and Legal Perspective. Journal of Law and Administration. 2024;20(4):38-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-4-73-38-49

Views: 234


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)