Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

Control (Supervisory) Powers of the Eurasian Economic Commission and the European Commission: Comparative Legal Aspect

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-4-73-50-67

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines the powers of the Eurasian Economic Commission (hereinafter referred to as the EEC) and the European Commission (hereinafter referred to as the EC) in the field of control (supervision) over the implementation of integration legal orders by member states and business entities, their scope, limits of competence, and impact on the development of integration processes in the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the EAEU) and the European Union (hereinafter referred to as the EU), as well as the role of the courts of the relevant integration associations in the implementation of the function under consideration by the Commissions. In addition, the author reviewed and analyzed the relevant law enforcement practice of the EEC and the EC, as well as the legal positions of the courts of the integration associations in question.

Materials and methods. This study uses the works of both Russian and foreign experts in the field of European law and the law of the EAEU, as well as analyzes the legal acts of the EU and the EAEU. The research used general scientific methods of cognition – analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction. Special legal methods were also used in the work – formal legal, technical legal, the method of legal analogy, as well as the comparative legal method.

Results of the study. As a result of the conducted research, it was revealed that despite the functioning of the EAEU for more than 10 years, there are certain problems in the activities of the EEC for the control (supervision) of the implementation by member States and economic entities of the EAEU law. In particular: the inability to apply to the EAEU Court with an application to bring to justice a member state that violated the norms of the EAEU law; the absence of a procedure in the law of the EAEU for prior notification of the EEC on acts adopted by the member States; the presence of fragmentation in the legal regulation of the EEC's control (supervisory) function over the implementation of the EAEU law by economic entities. The identified problems make it difficult for the EEC to effectively perform its duties in the part under consideration, and therefore they can be resolved through, inter alia, using the positive experience of the European Commission in exercising control (supervisory) powers over the implementation of European Union law.

Discussion and conclusion. The presence of the problems indicated in the article in the field of the EEC's control (supervisory) powers necessitates the introduction of comprehensive amendments to the EAEU Treaty, acts of the EAEU bodies, as well as the issuance of new acts that will regulate issues that have not been regulated by the EAEU law to date. Thus, based on the results of a comparative legal analysis of the powers, the author identified problems and formulated conclusions on the similarities and differences in the legal status of the EEC and the EC in terms of their exercise of control (supervisory) powers. The trends in the development of the law enforcement practice of the Commissions in terms of the fulfillment by member States and business entities of obligations within the framework of relevant integration associations are determined. The ways of improving the implementation of the control (supervisory) function by the Eurasian Economic Commission on the basis of the identified positive experience of the European Union are presented.

About the Author

T. D. Artemenko
I. Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

Timofei D. Artemenko, Postgraduate student at the High School of Law, I. Kant Baltic Federal University; Advisor to the State Civil Service of the Kaliningrad Region, 3rd class, Consultant to the Department for Legislative, Activity of the Government of the Kaliningrad Region

Kaliningrad



References

1. Anufrieva L.P., 2016. EAES i «pravo EAES» v mezhdunarodno-pravovom izmerenii [The EAEU and the «law of the EAEU» in the international legal dimension]. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. № 4. S. 48-62.

2. Artemenko T.D., 2023. Pravovoe regulirovanie okhranitel'noi funktsii evropeiskoi komissii [Legal regulation of the protective function of the European Commission]. Aktual'nye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya innovatsionnoi ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava: Sbornik nauchnykh statei po itogam ezhegodnoi Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi studencheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, Kaliningrad, 27–28 aprelya 2023 goda [Current problems and prospects for the development of innovative economics, management and law: A collection of scientific articles based on the results of the annual All-Russian Scientific and Practical Student Conference with international participation, Kaliningrad, April 27-28, 2023]. Moscow, S. 134-139.

3. Bakaeva O.Yu., 2016. Akty Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii kak istochnik prava EAES [Acts of the Eurasian Economic Commission as a Source of EAEU Law]. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii [Russian Journal of Legal Studies]. T. 3. № 3 (8). S. 73-76.

4. Bugaeva A.S., 2011. Evolyutsiya pravovogo statusa Evropeiskoi komissii v organizatsionnom mekhanizme Evropeiskogo Soyuza [Evolution of the legal status of the European Commission in the organizational mechanism of the European Union]: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Moscow.

5. Voinikov V.V., Artemenko T.D., 2023. Pravo EEK na obrashchenie v sud EAES: perspektivy razvitiya i opyt ES [The right of the EEC to appeal to the EAEU Court: development prospects and EU experience]. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. № 2. S. 21-37.

6. Voinikov V.V., Entina E.G., Entin M.L., 2019. Perspektivy, potrebnosti i podvodnye kamni konstitutsionalizatsii ES i EAES [Prospects, needs and pitfalls of EU and EAEU constitutionalization]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. № 4. S. 89-103.

7. Galushko D.V., 2020. Deyatel'nost' Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii kak osnovnogo reguliruyushchego organa Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [The activities of the Eurasian Economic Commission as the main regulatory body of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Law]. T. 17. № 4. S. 25-30.

8. Kas'yanov R.A., Smaznova A.P., 2017. Kontrol' v sfere gosudarstvennykh zakupok v ES i EAES: sravnitel'nyi analiz polnomochii Evropeiskoi komissii i Evraziiskoi ehkonomicheskoi komissii [Control in the field of public procurement in the EU and the EAEU: a comparative analysis of the powers of the European Commission and the Eurasian Economic Commission]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [The laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice]. № 11. S. 74-80.

9. Kolos D.G., 2019. Problemnye voprosy kompetentsii Suda EAES po razresheniyu sporov [Problematic issues of the competence of the EAEU Court for dispute resolution]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i obshchestvo [International relations and society]. № 3. S. 61-70.

10. Mazaeva N.N., 2022. Sovershenstvovanie deyatel'nosti Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii na osnove opyta funktsionirovaniya Evropeiskoi komissii ES [Improving the activities of the Eurasian Economic Commission based on the experience of the European Commission of the EU]. Ekonomicheskaya politika Rossii i tseli ustoichivogo razvitiya: Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov po materialam mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Moskva, 11–15 oktyabrya 2021 goda [Russia's Economic Policy and Sustainable Development Goals: A collection of scientific reports based on the materials of the international scientific conference, Moscow, October 11-15, 2021]. Moscow, S. 123-134.

11. Neshataeva T.N., 2016. Deistvie aktov Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii i Suda Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza v natsional'nykh pravoporyadkakh gosudarstv – chlenov Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [The effect of acts of the Eurasian Economic Commission and the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union in the national legal order of the member States of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie [Russian justice]. № 9 (125). S. 5-13.

12. Pivovar E.I., 2022. Evraziiskaya ekonomicheskaya komissiya: ot istokov k sovremennosti [Eurasian Economic Commission: from the origins to the present]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Evraziiskie issledovaniya. Istoriya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Eurasian Studies. History. Political science. International relations]. № 2. S. 12-45.

13. Sokolova N.A., 2017. Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soyuz: pravovaya priroda i priroda prava [The Eurasian Economic Union: the legal nature and the nature of law]. Lex russica. № 11. S. 47-57.

14. Shugurova I.V., 2020. Polnomochiya Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii v sfere nauchno-tekhnologicheskoi integratsii gosudarstv-chlenov EAES [The powers of the Eurasian Economic Commission in the field of scientific and technological integration of the EAEU Member States]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii [Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy]. № 5 (136). S. 114-128.

15. Entin K.V., 2021. Evraziiskaya ekonomicheskaya komissiya [Eurasian Economic Commission]. Sud Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza i stanovlenie prava EAES [The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union and the formation of the law of the EAEU]. Moscow, S. 134-142.

16. Entin M.L., 2020. Bezal'ternativnyi kharakter razvitiya ES [The non-alternative nature of EU development]. Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe]. № 4. S. 25-36.

17. Entin M.L., 2007. Evrosoyuz: Dogovor o reforme [EU: reform treaty]. Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe]. № 4. S. 19-32.

18. Chalmers D., 2022. The European Union and the re-establishment of democratic authority. European Law Journal. P. 1-20.

19. Kochenov D., Pech L., 2015. Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality. European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 11. Issue 3. P. 512-540.

20. Pakamanis M., 2016. The role of class actions in ensuring effective enforcement of competition law infringements in the European Union. International Comparative Jurisprudence. Vol. 2. Issue 2. P. 122-130.

21. Scheppele K. L., Kochenov D. V., Grabowska-Moroz B., 2020. EU Values Are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European commission and the Member States of the European Union. Yearbook of European Law. Vol. 39. P. 3-121.

22. Talking about European Democracy. European Constitutional Law Review. 2017. Vol. 13. Issue 2. P. 207-220.


Review

For citations:


Artemenko T.D. Control (Supervisory) Powers of the Eurasian Economic Commission and the European Commission: Comparative Legal Aspect. Journal of Law and Administration. 2024;20(4):50-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2024-4-73-50-67

Views: 157


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)