Agreements on Alternative Methods of Conflicts Settlement: Their Legal Essence and Advantages
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-3-48-53-59
Abstract
Introduction. In the article the legal nature of agreements on alternative methods of settlement of the conflicts is analyzed. The terminological problem of use of various categories connected with alternative settlement of the conflicts is considered. The author claims that the agreement under consideration has civil character, and is directed to change of the general order of protection of the subjective civil rights of contractors. The article proves that the conclusion of the designated agreement has essential advantages to contractors since it allows them to save time and money, to keep partnership, confidentiality and to choose a professional intermediary.
Materials and methods. The theoretical basis of the research rests on the works by the Russian and foreign researchers in which various methods of alternative conflict settlement are considered. In particular, the terminological issues concerning the use of the term «alternative methods of settlement of disputes» are analysed by Davydenko D.L. The works of the Russian(Inshakova A. Oh, Kazachenok S. Yu., Sevastyanova, TymchukYu.A., etc.) and foreign (Brown J., Harvey K., Kovick D., Susskind E.L.) researchers are devoted to current trends of development of alternative methods of conflicts settlement. The complex research of the existing alternative mechanisms of settlement of disputes is presented in the works «Ways of settlement of disputes in different law systems » (by Artemyev Yu.A., Ermakov E.P., Kovyrshin N.A., Rusakova E.P.), «Alternative mechanisms of settlement of disputes as the instrument of formation of the favorable environment for business activity (evidence of Russia and foreign countries)» (editor-in-chief N.G. Semilyutin. M). At the same time, it is necessary to state that there is a lack of the scientifc works exploring the issues of agreements on alternative methods of conflict settlement. The study used both general scientifc methods (dialectical method of cognition, analysis, synthesis, etc.) and particular scientifc methods (formal legal, logical, etc.) of scientifc cognition.
Results of a research. As a result of the analysis, the author’s defnition of the category “agreements on alternative methods of conflict resolution” was formulated, the essential features of the agreements under consideration were identifed, and the advantages of their conclusion were justifed. The author argues that agreements on alternative methods for resolving conflicts are of a civil law nature, and, accordingly, constitute a specifc type of contract (agreement on the use of a conflict resolution complaint procedure, arbitration agreement, mediation agreement).
Discussion and conclusion. The need to develop the corresponding practical recommendations is proved taking into account the advantages of the conclusion of agreements to use the alternative methods of conflicts settlement. It is emphasized that the existence of evidence-based practical recommendations about the conclusion of agreements acts as one of the factors ensuring the effectiveness of their realization.
References
1. Brown, J., Harvey, K., Kovick D., Susskind, E.L., 2009. Teaching About the Mediation of Values-Based and IdentityBased Disputes: A Teaching Note: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
2. Inshakova, A.O., Kazachenok, S.Y., 2014. Gradual Genesis of the Institute of Arbitration Agreement: From Ancient Civilizations to Our Days. Bylye Gody. № 31 (1).
3. Inshakova A., Kazachenok S., Frolov D., Maruschak I., 2016. WTO Principles in the Jurisprudence of International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Institutional Study of Great Britain and Russia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. Volume VII. Issue 3(17).
4. Marc Blessing, 1999. Introduction to Arbitration - Swiss and International Perspectives - Helbling&Lichtenhan Verlag AG, Basle, Switzerland.
5. Vladimirova,S.A., 2012. Sravnitel’naya harakteristika mediacii i tretejskogo razbiratel’stva sporov kak al’ternativnyh metodov uregulirovaniya konfliktov [Comparative characteristic of mediation and arbitration of disputes as alternative methods of settlement of the conflicts]. Razvitie mediacii v Rossii: teoriya, praktika, obrazovanie:sbornik statej [Development of mediation in Russia: theory, practice, education: collected papers]. Moscow, Berlin.
6. Davydenko, D.L., 2009. Voprosy yuridicheskoj terminologii v sfere «al’ternativnogo razresheniya sporov» [Questions of a legal language in the sphere of «alternative settlement of disputes»]. Tretejskij sud [Arbitration court]. No. 1.
7. Davydenko, D.L., 2009. Riski dlya razvitiya primiritel’noj praktiki v Rossii [Risks for development of conciliatory practice in Russia]. Hozyajstvo i pravo [Economy and Law]. № 9.
8. Inshakova A.O., Tymchuk YU.A., 2018. Cifrovye tekhnologii al’ternativnyh metodov razresheniya sporov: zarubezhnaya praktika i perspektivy primeneniya v Rossii [Digital technologies of alternative methods of settlement of disputes: foreign practice and the prospects of application in Russia]. Pravo i upravlenie.XXI vek [Journal of Law and Administration]. № 1(46).
9. Kazachenok, S.Yu., 2015. Sokrashchenie predelov uchastiya gosudarstva v voprosah uregulirovaniya spornyh vneshneehkonomicheskih otnoshenij: prichinno-sledstvennaya svyaz’ [Reduction of limits of participation of the state in questions of settlement of the disputable external economic relations: relationship of cause and effect]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta.Yuridicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Perm University. Jurisprudence]. No. 1.
10. Sevast’yanov, G.V., 2012. Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya ARS v Rossii [Current trends of development of ARS in Russia]. Razvitie mediacii v Rossii: teoriya, praktika, obrazovanie:sbornik statej [Development of mediation in Russia: theory, practice, education: collected papers]. Moscow, Berlin.
11. Artem’eva Y.A., Borisova E.A., Ermakova E.P., 2017. Sposoby razresheniya sporov v raznosistemnyh pravoporyadkah [Ways of settlement of disputes in raznosistemny laws and orders]. SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus». [ConsultantPlus.].
12. Hocanov, D.A., 2012. Kompetenciya mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: vozmozhnost’ razresheniya na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii sporov mezhdu inostrannymi kompaniyami, uchrezhdennymii dejstvuyushchimi v odnom gosudarstve[Competence of the international commercial arbitration: a possibility of permission to territories of the Russian Federation of disputes between the foreign companies founded and operating in one state]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha [Bulletin of the international commercial arbitration]. № 1.
Review
For citations:
Stepanova I.А. Agreements on Alternative Methods of Conflicts Settlement: Their Legal Essence and Advantages. Journal of Law and Administration. 2018;(3):53-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-3-48-53-59