External Relations of the Regions: the Main Problems of Paradiplomacy Theory
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-3-48-99-106
Abstract
Introduction: The article discusses the theoretical basis of research in the feld of paradiplomacy or external relations of intrastate administrative-territorial entities. Paradiplomacy is an umbrella concept within several theoretical approaches that are significantly close in content. The author analyzes the main problems in the theory of diplomacy related to the lack of heuristic potential and the lack of a formed conceptual grid.
Materials and methods: from a theoretical and methodological point of view, the author uses the hermeneutic approach, which allows to combine descriptive techniques and analysis of the subjective aspects of the given phenomenon. In addition, the author relies on a comparative historical method and a normative political analysis, which makes it possible to ft the facts of political reality into the framework of political theory. The paradiplomatic practice of Russia, Brazil, Canada, USA, Tanzania, and the Republic of South Africa acted as the material for the study.
Research results: the author has identifed three main problems of the theory of paradiplomacy, which delay its further development. The theory of paradiplomacy does not have clear answers for questions of the spatial transformation of administrative-territorial units and the relationship of these transformation processes with paradiplomatic activity. The theory of paradiplomacy is unable to explain the phenomena of multilateral interregional relations and the unevenness of paradiplomatic activity.
Discussions and conclusions: the author states that the existing theoretical approaches to paradiplomacy are mainly descriptive in nature and do not address the problems of a methodological, epistemological and normative nature, which is an undoubted drawback.
About the Author
I. D. Loshkariov
MGIMO-University under the MFA of Russia.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan Loshkariov,
Lecturer with the Political Theory Department
References
1. Akimov YU.G., 2011. Kvebekskaya paradiplomatiya i poziciya federal’nogo pravitel’stva Kanady: ot konflikta k kompromissu [Quebec paradiplomacy and the position of the federal government of Canada: from conflict to compromise]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Filosofya. Kul’turologiya. Politologiya. Pravo. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [The Herald of Sanct-Petersburg University. Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Political Science, Law and International Relations]. № 4.
2. Blagodatskih V.G., Kerimov A.A., 2018. Paradiplomatiya kak kategoriya politicheskoj nauki: teoretiko-metodologicheskie podhody i shkoly [Paradiplomatia as a category of political science: theoretical and methodological approaches and schools of thought]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoricheskie nauki» [The Herald of Omsk University. Historical Sciences]. №1 (17).
3. Mineev A.P., 2015. K voprosu o politicheskoj inokul’turnosti rossijskih regionov [On the issue the political foreign culture of the Russian regions]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy [Actual problems of Europe]. № 1.
4. Muraeva YA.N., 2016. Voprosy social’no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Nemeckogo nacional’nogo rajona Altajskogo kraya [Issues of socio-economic development of the German National District of the Altai Krai]. Aktual’nye voprosy funkcionirovaniya ehkonomiki Altajskogo kraya [Actual problems of the Altai Kraj economy’s functioning]. Vol. 8.
5. Paren’kov D.A., 2008. Monitoring kak instrument povysheniya kachestva tamozhennogo administrirovaniya [Monitoring as a tool to improve the quality of customs administration]. Rol’ i mesto Rossijskoj tamozhennoj akademii v razvitii tamozhennogo dela sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj yubilejnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii v 2 chastyah [The Role and Place of the Russian Customs Service Academy in Customs Affairs. Materials of International Conference]. Redkollegiya: V.S. Chechevatov (predsedatel’), A.YA. CHernysh (zam. pred.), E.G. Anisimov, N.P. Bagmet, S.V. Baramzin, T.YU. Vodostoeva, V. A. ZHbankov, K.A. Kornyakov, N.G. Lipatova, T.D. Mihajlenko, V.E. Novikov, N.P. Pankratova, M.A. Ryl’skaya, O.G. Simahin, I.B. Alyab’eva. Moscow.
6. Shajmardanova Z.D., Makashev ZH.K., 2018. Usilenie roli subnacional’nyh aktorov [Strengthening the role of subnational actors]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science]. № 2.
7. Breslin S., Hook G.D., 2002. Researching Microregional Integration: Towards New Frameworks of Analyses. Microregionalism and World Order. Ed. by S. Breslin G.D. Hook. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
8. Brown A., 2010. Political Tensions in Zanzibar: Echoes from the Revolution? Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement. № 30 (3-4).
9. сornago N., 1999. Diplomacy and paradiplomacy in the redefnition of international security: Dimensions of conflict and co-operation. Paradiplomacy in action: the foreign relations of subnational governments. Ed. by Aldecoa F., Keating M. London-Portland: Frank Cass.
10. Foreign Relations in Federal Countries. еd. by H. Michelmann. Montreal & Kingston. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2009.
11. Hocking B., 1993. Localising Foreign Policy: Non-central Governments and Multi-layered Diplomacy. London: Macmillan.
12. Klatt M., Wassenberg B., 2017. Secondary foreign policy: Can local and regional cross-border cooperation function as a tool for peace-building and reconciliation? Regional & Federal Studies. № 27 (3).
13. Lecours A., 2002. Paradiplomacy: reflections on the foreign policy and international relations of regions. International Negotiation. Vol. 7.
14. Mavungu, E.M., 2016. Frontiers of power and prosperity: explaining provincial boundary disputes in postapartheid South Africa. African Studies Review. № 59(2).
15. McConnell F., Moreau T., Dittmer J., 2012. Mimicking state diplomacy: The legitimizing strategies of unoffcial diplomacies. Geoforum. № 43(4).
16. Nganje F.I., 2013. Paradiplomacy: a comparative analysis of the international relations of South Africa’s Gauteng, North West and Western Cape provinces. D. Phil. (in Politics) Thesis. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg. URL: https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za.
17. Royles E., 2017. Sub-state diplomacy: Understanding the international opportunity structures. Regional & Federal Studies. № 27(4).
18. Salomon M., 2016. Paradiplomacy in the developing world: the case of Brazil. Cities and Global Governance. New Sites for International Relations. Ed.by M. Amen, N.J. Toly, P. Mccarney, K. Segbers. Routledge.
19. Tavares R., 2016. Paradiplomacy: cities and state as global players. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. di Robert V. Yengibaryan., 2014. Time chooses us, we choose everything else… Democrazia e diritto [Democracy and Law]. № 4.
Review
For citations:
Loshkariov I.D. External Relations of the Regions: the Main Problems of Paradiplomacy Theory. Journal of Law and Administration. 2018;(3):99-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-3-48-99-106
Views:
1205
Email this article 