Formation of public administration and public service systems in the unrecognized states of Donbas Region
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2019-1-50-51-60
Abstract
Introduction. In this article we aim to identify common patterns and specifications of the state institutions development in the self-proclaimed states in the South-East of Ukraine named Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics (the DPR, the LPR).
Materials and methods. For the first time we described the models of public administration and bureaucracy in the DPR and the LPR, and then we compared them with the systems of Russia and the Ukraine using the case study method, classification, comparative legal analysis and best practices identification.
Results of the study. We proved that state-building in the unrecognized states of Donbas moves towards democratization: the role of the armed forces is reduced as well as the concentration of power, and democratic freedoms are expanded. The organization of the public authorities in the self-proclaimed republics is similar to the system of the Ukraine (e.g.: unicameral parliament and unitary system), but the public service is built according the Russian model.
Discussion and conclusions. The DPR and the LPR passed legal acts and adopted the system of executive bodies, which are not yet available in Russia. The LPR’s experience in using annual reports of civil servants for their certification, control, analysis of the distribution of official duties, and performance improvement is of significant interest. The service ethics in the LPR is formalized in the Code of Civil Servants’ Conduct which has a higher legal status than the General Principles of Service Conduct that exists in the civil service of Russia.
About the Author
G. A. BorshchevskiyRussian Federation
Georgiy A. Borshchevskiy, Candidate of Science (History), Associate Professor
References
1. Abradova Y.S., 2018. Formirovaniye novoy ukrainskoy identichnosti v postmaydannyy period (2014-2018 gg.) [Formation of a new Ukrainian identity in the post-Mayd period (2014-2018)]. Vlast’ [The Power]. № 5.
2. Mednikova A.A., 2018. Analiz problematiki instituta priznaniya gosudarstv [Analysis of the problems of the institute of state recognition]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and practice of social development]. № 1.
3. Onopko O.V., 2018. Vneshnyaya politika Donetskoy Narodnoy Respubliki: interesy i ideologiya [Foreign Policy of the Donetsk People’s Republic: Interests and Ideology]. Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scientific Reports of Belgorod State University]. № 2.
4. Okhotskiy Y.V., 2018. Postsovetskaya Ukraina: pravyashchiy rezhim v politicheskom prostranstve ukrainstva, yevropeyskogo vybora i rusofobii (politiko-pravovoy analiz) [Post-Soviet Ukraine: the ruling regime in the political space of Ukrainians, the European choice and Russophobia (political and legal analysis)]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy [Russian Journal of Legal Studies]. № 1.
5. Sichkar V.A.. 2018.Teoretiko-pravovyye osnovy formirovaniya Narodnogo soveta Donetskoy Narodnoy Respubliki [Theoretical and legal foundations of the formation of the People’s Council of Donetsk People’s Republic]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy [Bulletin of the Institute for Economic Research]. № 2.
6. Burke J., Panina-Burke S., 2015. Eastern and Southern Ukraine’s Right to Secede and Join the Russian Federation. Russian Law Journal. Vol. 3. No 1.
7. Caspersen N., 2016. Making Peace with De Facto States. The Annual of Language and Language of Politics and Identity. Vol. 10.
8. Cismas I., 2010. Secession in Theory and Practice: the Case of Kosovo and Beyond. Goettingen Journal of International Law. Vol. 2. No 2.
9. Katchanovski I., 2016. The Separatist Conflict in Donbas: A Violent Break-Up of Ukraine? Perspectives on European Politics and Society. Vol. 17. No. 4.
10. Kuzio T., 2005. Regime type and politics in Ukraine under Kuchma. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. No 38.
11. Müllerson R., 2009. Precedents in the mountains: on the parallels and uniqueness of the cases of Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Chinese Journal of International Law. Vol. 8. No 1.
12. Oeter S., 2015. The Kosovo Case – An Unfortunate Precedent. Heidelberg Journal of International Law. Vol. 75. No 1.
13. Twickel N., Sasse G., Baumann M., 2018. The Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Russian Analytical Digest Center for Security Studies. No 214.
Review
For citations:
Borshchevskiy G.A. Formation of public administration and public service systems in the unrecognized states of Donbas Region. Journal of Law and Administration. 2019;15(1):51-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2019-1-50-51-60