Corporations and human rights - new challenges and solutions

Introduction. The article examines the issues of legal personality related to human rights in international and national law and whether these relations are limited by the interaction of the state and the individual.

Since 2016 the United States has been investigating alleged Russian meddling in the US election, which, in addition to hacker attacks, might have been carried out through social networks and services owned by the American multinational corporations – Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, etc. Discussions in the Senate shed light on the business activities of the companies themselves which had an opportunity to manipulate and most likely manipulated the public consciousness, which is a violation of the basic human rights to freedom of choice, freedom of the media and others. At the same time this activity occurred with the alleged observance of legislation and contract law.

The article discusses various aspects of the activities of Google and Facebook during a number of American electoral campaigns as evidence of corporate human rights violations.

Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the study comprises general scientific (analysis, analogy, comparison) and special methods of researching legal phenomena and processes (method of interpretation of legal norms, technical-legal, formal-legal and formal-logical methods).

The results of the study. Nowadays Corporations have reached a level of influence comparable to that of the states. But if for economists or political scientists there is no question of including companies in the legal personality structure, lawyers still have doubts. The analysis shows that the traditional approach to human rights as a relationship exclusively between the state and the individual does not fully meet modern realities. The person of legal relations is a participant in interaction regulated by the rules of law. The electoral campaigns in the United States in recent years show that large transnational corporations are able to violate the fundamental rights of the person enshrined in the constitution while observing secondary norms designed to ensure their implementation as well as contract law concerning user agreements.

Discussion and conclusions. The necessity of considering human rights in the system of relations “state corporation – physical individual” was substantiated. The conclusion is made that corporations are a threat to the observance of human rights. The topicality of researching the American experience regarding Internet companies influencing the electoral processes in Russia was shown.

1. Arsen’ev I.A., 2015. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnoj i nacional’noj sistemy zashchity prav cheloveka [Correlation of international and national human rights protection system] Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal [Eurasian Law Journal]. № 9 (88). P. 54-58.

2. Blishchenko I.P., ZH. Doriya, 1999. Precedenty v mezhdunarodnom publichnom i chastnom prave [Precedents in international public and private law] Moscow.

3. Videozapis’ vstupitel’noj rechi Senatora T. Kruza na slushaniyah v Senate SSHA. Iyul’ 2019 [Video of the opening speech of Senator T. Cruz at a hearing in the US Senate, July 2019]. Youtube .

4. Videozapis’ vystupleniya R. Eptshtejna na slushaniyah v Senate SSHA, iyul’ 2019 [Video recording of R. Eptstein’s speech at the hearings in the US Senate, July 2019]. Youtube .

5. Principy raboty poiska [The principles of the search]. Sajt Google poiska [Google Search Site].

6. Sajt Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda. Informaciya po grazhdanskim delam apellyacionnoj instancii. Delo № 33- 30344 [Site of the Moscow City Court. Information on civil cases of appeal. Case № 33-30344].

7. Senat SShA opublikuet otchet po sobstvennomu “rossijskomu rassledovaniyu” [The US Senate will publish a report on its own “Russian investigation”]. RIA Novosti [RIA Novosti]. 28.06.2019.

8. Dr. Robert Epstein on Google’s ability to affect the outcome of elections. Sajt telekanala Fox News [Fox News Channel website]. 08.09.2019.

9. Epstein R., 2016. Subtle New Forms of Internet Influence Are Putting Democracy at Risk Worldwide. In: Lee N. (eds) Google It. Springer, New York.

10. Epstein R., Robertson E., 2015. The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 112(33), E4512-E4521.

11. Epstein R, Robertson E., Lazer D., Wilson C., 2017. Suppressing the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). ACM Human-Computer Interaction . Vol. 1. No. 2. Article 42.

12. Epstein R, Robertson E., Smyth R., Vasconcellos T., Lao M., 2016. Which Relationship Skills Count Most? A Large-Scale Replication. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions. Vol. 15. Issue 4.