Naturalism and political science: adaptation to the non-classical world picture
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2020-1-54-14-27
Abstract
Introduction. One of the greatest achievements of the humanity is obviously the recognition of the systematic unity of the natural and social knowledge. However, this recognition was not constant. The emergence, development and history of political sciences reflected it rather evidently, tending to go from one extreme to another – from identifying its methods with those of positive science to pretending to be unique or even universal. All these questions acquired special importance in the new non-classical world, but the adaptation of political sciences to a new type of thinking meets considerable difficulties.
Methods of study. The main method of the study is comparative analysis of the variations to connect philosophical and substantive (ontological and epistemological) tools with political and applied ones of researching political and international political processes and phenomena. Moreover, the authors also used the interpretation approach.
Results. The analysis of the most significant approaches towards the political and international processes demonstrate that the acceptance of the new postulates of non-classical and post-nonclassical pictures of the world is quite complicated. Simultaneously with the preservation of the pure mechanistic, approach some of the elements of the new world pictures were taken from quantum physics, biology. The chance factor and the rejection of the casual relationships were also taken into consideration. Nevertheless, it is better to speak not about the transfer of the methods and approaches from natural to political sciences, but about the attempts to build “weak” theories or analogues of theories (for instance, quantum-like theories). Nevertheless, generally speaking, political as well as other social sciences tend to be developing capturing the zeitgeist.
Discussion and Conclusions. The adaptation of political sciences to new scientific pictures of the world is inevitable, but limited by definition: for all unity of knowledge as such, their methods and tools are very different and even undergo such significant changes and simplifications in the process of adaptation that they often retain only the names and imitations of the methodologies of other sciences. And yet, at least we have to go in parallel. But some caution here would not hurt at all.
About the Authors
T. A. AlekseevaRussian Federation
Tatiana A. Alekseeva, Dr. of Philosophy, Professor, Honored Scholar of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Political theory
A. P. Mineyev
Russian Federation
Aleksandr P. Mineyev, Dr of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Department of Political Theory
References
1. Alekseeva T.A., 2019. Teoriya mejdunarodnyh otnoshenij kak politicheskaya filosofiya i nauka [Theory of International Relations as political philosophy and science]. Moscow.
2. Gaman-Golutvina O.V., 2019. Preodolevaya metodologicheskie razlichiya: spory o poznanii politiki v epohu neopredelennosti [Overcoming the methodological differences: the discussions about the cognition of politics in the epoch of uncertainty]. POLIS (Politicheskie issledovaniya) [POLIS- Political Studies]. № 5.
3. Golubev D., 2019. Nauka i innovacii v teoriyah mejdunarodnyh otnoshenij [Science and innovations in the theories of international relations]. Mejdunarodnye process [International processes]. Vol. 13. № 2.
4. Dobruskin M.E., 2003. Edinstvo nauchnogo znaniya – zakonomernost razvitiya nauki [Unity of the scientific knowledge – the regularity of the science development]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society]. № 2 (31). URL: https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/255345/
5. Zohar Dana, 2017. Kvantovyj lider. Revolyuciya v myshlenii i praktike biznesa [The Quantum Leader. Revolution in the thinking and business practice]. Sofiya.
6. Hajdegger M., 1993. Vremya kartiny mira - Novaya tekhnokraticheskaya volna na Zapade [Time of the world picture The New technological wave in the West]. Moscow.
7. Ejnshtejn A., Infeld L., 1965. Evolyuciya fiziki. Razvitie idej ot pervonachalnyh ponyatij do teorii otnositelnosti i kvantov [The evolution of physics. The development of the ideas from the initial meanings to the theory of relativity and quants]. Moscow. Citing: Vikent.ru
8. Bagehot, Walter., 2001. Physics and Politics or Thoughts on the Application of the Principles of Natural Selection and Inheritance to Political Society, Kitchener: Batoche Books
9. Carr, Edward H., 1964. The Twenty Years’ Crises, 1919-1939. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. NY: Harper Torchbook.
10. Kuhn, Thomas, 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Lapid, Yosef, 1989. The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly. September. № 33.
12. Lowell, 1910. The “Physiology of Politics”. American Political Science review. February. № 4; Ross, Dorothy, 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Merriam, Charles, 1926. Progress in Political Research. American Political Science Review. February.
14. Munro, William Bennett, 1928. Physics and Politics- an Old Analogy Revised. The American Political Science Review. February. Vol. XXII. No 1. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/content/view
15. Ross, Dorothy, 1991. The Origins of American Social Science, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Russett, Bruce and John Oneal, 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, NY: W.W. Norton.
17. Thiele, Leslie Paul, 2003. Thinking Politics: Perspectives in Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern Political Theory, NY: Seven Bridges.
18. Wendt, Alexander, 2015. Quantum Mind and Social Science. Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Wendt, Alexander, 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Zohar, Danah; Marshall, Ian, 1994. The Quantum Society: Mind, Physics, and a New Social Vision. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Review
For citations:
Alekseeva T.A., Mineyev A.P. Naturalism and political science: adaptation to the non-classical world picture. Journal of Law and Administration. 2020;16(1):14-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2020-1-54-14-27