Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

Evolution of the Syrian Peace Process and the Position of the “Key” States Regarding the Syria’s Return to the Arab Fold

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2023-3-68-15-27

Abstract

Introduction: The Syrian conflict remains one of the most acute unresolved conflicts of our time. Its internationalization, the active intervention of foreign states, especially the United States and Turkey in the dynamics of the conflict and their military presence on Syrian territory, remain obstacles to the settlement. However, the spring of 2023 was marked by a number of political events in the Middle East, which allow us to take a fresh look at the prospects for the Syrian peace process. Against the backdrop of increasing Israeli strikes against Syria, a serious strengthening of Iran's position and cross-border se­curity threats spreading from Syria in the face of de­teriorating socio-economic indicators in Syria due to Western sanctions, the leading Arab countries began to reconsider their relations with earlier rejected by them President B. Assad and started negotiations on the "return" of Syria to the Arab family.  

Materials and methods: Russian and foreign studies on the Syrian peace process, news sources of the world media were used as materials for writing the article. The methodological base was made up of discourse analysis and a comparative analysis of the approaches of the largest regional powers to the issue of resolving the Syrian conflict.  

Research results: The admission of Syria to the League of Arab States, the opening of diplomatic missions of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Oman in Syria allow us to conclude that the peace process is now in the hands of the countries of the Middle East region. The peace process also no longer consists of negotiations between the regional countries involved in the conflict and the Syrian government solely over the political structure of Syria, but rather consists of negotiations on the conditions for the legitimization of the Syrian au­thorities.  

Discussion and conclusion: At the same time, the role of Russia in the peace process is to organize negotiations between Syria and a number of the most authoritative Middle Eastern states: Turkey and Iran, in order to find acceptable conditions for the normalization and withdrawal of their troops from the territory of Syria in exchange for guarantees of their security and maintaining a certain balance of their interests in Syria and the Middle East region as a whole. The existing joint foreign policy interests in other regions of Russia with Turkey and Iran built interdependence relations and gave Moscow certain levers of influence on them in the Syrian negotiation process, which makes it an influential participant in the settlement of the conflict.

About the Author

L. R. Rustamova
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO)
Russian Federation

Leili R. Rustamova, researcher



References

1. Aksenyonok A., 2018. Perspektivy poslevoennoj Sirii: konstituciya i gosudarstvenno-politicheskoe ustrojstvo [Prospects for post-war Syria: constitution and state-political structure]. RSMD. 27.06.2018. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru.

2. Aksenyonok A., 2023. Sirijskij konflikt: 12 let spustya [The Syrian conflict: 12 years later]. RSMD. 01.03.2023. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru.

3. Ahmedov V., 2023. Evolyuciya irano-izrail'skih otnoshenij v usloviyah krizisa v Sirii [The evolution of Iranian-Israeli relations in the conditions of the crisis in Syria]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti. [Pathways to Peace and Security]. № 1(64). P. 147-166. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2023-1-147-166.

4. Gevorgyan A.G., 2019. Kurdskij vopros v turecko-sirijskih otnosheniyah v kontekste sirijskogo krizisa [The Kurdish issue in Turkish-Syrian relations in the context of the Syrian crisis]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. [Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: International relations]. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 615-624. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-4-615-624.

5. Ivanov S., 2023. K vozmozhnoj vstreche Erdogana i Asada [Towards a possible meeting between Erdogan and Assad]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. [The International Affairs]. 12.01. URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/38553.

6. Isaev L., 2017. Zachem Rossiya napisala Konstituciyu dlya Sirii? [Why did Russia write the Constitution for Syria?]. Fond Karnegi za mezhdunarodnyj mir. [Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]. 15.02. URL: https://carnegiemoscow.org/commentary/67999

7. Kuz'min V.A., Sokolov N.V., 2017. Protivostoyanie Saudovskoj Aravii i Irana na Blizhnem Vostoke v period «arabskoj vesny» [Confrontation between Saudi Arabia and Iran in the Middle East during the "Arab spring]. Musul'manskij mir [Muslim world]. No. 3. P. 16-25.

8. Kuz'min V.A., Sokolov N.V., 2018. Celi i pozicii Saudovskoj Aravii i Irana v sirijskom voprose [The goals and positions of Saudi Arabia and Iran in the Syrian issue]. Musul'manskij mir [Muslim world]. No. 1. P. 6-11.

9. Matveev I.A., 2022. Politekonomicheskaya model' uregulirovaniya situacii v Sirii v kontekste ukrainskogo konflikta: rabochaya tetrad' No 67 / 2022 / [Political and economic model for resolving the situation in Syria in the context of the Ukrainian conflict: workbook No 67]. Ed. by E.O. Karpinskaya, I.A. Bocharov, I.A. Cymbal. Rossijskij sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam (RSMD) [Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC)]. Moscow. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru.

10. Mustafa El'-Labbad, 2016. Krah turecko-saudovskogo strategicheskogo al'yansa [The collapse of the Turkish-Saudi strategic alliance]. Valdaj. 29.03. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com.

11. Nadein-Raevskij V., 2020. Politika Turcii na Blizhnem Vostoke [Turkish policy in the Middle East]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti [Pathways to Peace and Security]. No. 1(58). P. 139-156. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2020-1-139-156.

12. Rabat L., 2021. Slozhnosti razresheniya sirijskogo konflikta: vneshnee vmeshatel'stvo i "liberal'nyj" podhod k mirostroitel'stvu [Difficulties in resolving the Syrian conflict: external intervention and the "liberal" approach to peacebuilding]. Voprosy nacional'nyh i federativnyh otnoshenij [Questions of national and federal relations]. Vol. 11, No. 2(71). P. 481-490. DOI: 10.35775/PSI.2021.67.2.017.

13. Rustamova L.R., 2022. Vklad mezhdunarodnyh nepravitel'stvennyh organizacij v processy mirnogo uregulirovaniya konfliktov: kejs sirijskogo konflikta [The contribution of international non-governmental organizations to the processes of peaceful settlement of conflicts: the case of the Syrian conflict]. Mirovaya politika [World Politics]. No. P. 32-45. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2022.4.38836.

14. Smagin N., 2023. Drugaya specoperaciya. Zachem Rossiya ostaetsya v Sirii [Another special operation. Why Russia Stays in Syria]. Fond Karnegi za Mezhdunarodnyj Mir [Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]. 30.01. URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/88958

15. Hlebnikov A., 2023. Vizit prezidenta Sirii v Rossiyu v menyayushchemsya regional'nom kontekste [The visit of the President of Syria to Russia in a changing regional context]. RSMD. 17.03. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru.

16. Hlebnikov A., 2023. Siriya na pereput'e: ekonomicheskie i diplomaticheskie igry Damaska [Syria at the Crossroads: Economic and Diplomatic Games of Damascus]. Valdaj. 26.05. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com

17. Prasad H., 2022. Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Complicates the Situation in Syria. The Carter Center. 07.07. URL: https://www.cartercenter.org.

18. Saban N., 2020. Factbox: Iranian influence and presence in Syria. Atlantic Council Comment. 5 November. URL: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org.

19. Vogel A., 2023. Russian-Iranian-Turkish trilateral relations in the syrian civil war. Pathways to Peace and Security. No. 1(64). P. 76-110. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2023-1-76-110.


Review

For citations:


Rustamova L.R. Evolution of the Syrian Peace Process and the Position of the “Key” States Regarding the Syria’s Return to the Arab Fold. Journal of Law and Administration. 2023;19(3):15-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2023-3-68-15-27

Views: 463


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)