Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

LEGAL REGULATION OF FLORA AND FAUNA IMPORT AND EXPORT EVIDENCED BY THE LEGISLATION OF GERMANY, THE USA AND JAPAN

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2017-4-45-9-16

Abstract

Introduction. In the modern world environmental problems become more and more apparent, highlighting fragility of the environment. At the same time fight against offenses in this sphere remains a weak link and, undoubtedly, demands development of appropriate legal framework on the international and national levels. Nowadays the only international treaty regulating movement of flora and fauna objects is the CITES Convention of 1973. On the national level such matters are usually regulated by environment protection laws. Methods and materials. In the research the authors applied general scientific (analysis, deduction) and special juridical (comparative law, technical juridical) methods. Results of the research. The authors of the article consider measures suppressing illegal movement of flora and fauna objects, analyze corresponding experience of foreign legal regulation (structures of offenses, types and measures of responsibility, competent authorities and their powers) using the evidence of the USA, Germany and Japan. Discussion and conclusions. The authors come to the conclusion that the reform of the legislation is needed and propose a number of ideas for further improvement of regulation in this sphere including redistribution of powers of competent public authorities, development of the population encouragement system and active use of modern technologies.

About the Authors

N. A. Vorontsova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) under the MFA of Russia
Russian Federation
Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Department of International Law


I. A. Klimova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) under the MFA of Russia
Russian Federation
Master’s Course 2nd Year Student, Faculty of International Law


References

1. Bekjashev D.K., Bekjashev A.K., 1995. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy bor’by s nezakonnym rybolovstvom: monografija. [Problems of the international law concerning fight against illegal fishing]. Moscow.

2. Bor’ba s kriminal’nymi rynkami v Rossii: monografija. [Fight against criminal markets in Russia]. Pod red. V.V. Merkur’eva. 2015. Moscow.

3. Doklad JeKOSOS [ECOSOC Report] E/CN. 15.2003.8. 4.03.2003.

4. Kukushkina A.V., 2011. Bor’ba s prestupnost’ju i ohrana dikoj fauny i flory ot nezakonnogo oborota [Fight against crime and wild flora and fauna protection against illegal trafficking]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [Herald of MGIMOUniversity]. № 4. S. 233-239.

5. Anderson R.S., 1995. The Lacey Act: America’s Premier Weapon in the Fight Against Unlawful Wildlife Trafficking. Public Land Law Review. № 27.

6. Annual Report FY 2007 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Office of Law Enforcement. September, 2008.

7. Bowman M., 2013. A Tale of Two CITES: Divergent Perspectives upon the Effectiveness of the Wildlife Trade Convention. Review Of European Comparative & International Environmental Law. № 3.

8. Eberhardt S., 2013. The Lacey Act amendments and United States’ policing of international trade. Houston Journal of International Law. Spring.

9. Elliott L., 2012. Fighting transnational environmental crime. Journal of International Affairs. №. 1.

10. Facts about the Amended U.S. Lacey Act. APHIS. Plant Protection and Quarantine. March, 2009. URL: https://www.aphis.usda.gov.

11. Julie A., 2017. Prevention of Transnational Environmental Crime and Regulatory Pluralism. In Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by DRAHOS PETER. Acton ACT, Australia: ANU Press.

12. Milledge R., D., S., Cooney R., Sas-Rolfes M., Biggs D., Murphree M., Kasterine A., 2014. The Elephant in the Room: Sustainable Use in the Illegal Wildlife Trade Debate. Report. International Institute for Environment and Development. URL: http://pubs.iied.org.

13. Prestemon J., 2015. The impacts of the Lacey Act Amendment of 2008 on U.S. hardwood lumber and hardwood plywood imports. Forest Policy & Economics. January.

14. Protect Japan’s biodiversity. September 18, 2012. Japan Times [serial online]. URL: https://www.japantimes.co.jp.

15. Wildlife conservation in Japan. Japanese Ministry of Environment. URL: https://www.env.go.jp.

16. Wittemyer W., J., G., Klinkenberg B., Douglas-Hamilton I., 2014. Novel Opportunities for Wildlife Conservation and Research with Real-time Monitoring. Ecological Applications. April.


Review

For citations:


Vorontsova N.A., Klimova I.A. LEGAL REGULATION OF FLORA AND FAUNA IMPORT AND EXPORT EVIDENCED BY THE LEGISLATION OF GERMANY, THE USA AND JAPAN. Journal of Law and Administration. 2017;(4):9-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2017-4-45-9-16

Views: 451


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)