Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

BUILDING EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON ANTI-RUSSIAN SANCTIONS: ECONOMY VERSUS POLITICS

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2017-4-45-69-77

Abstract

Introduction. The decision of the European Union to impose sanctions on Russia, its largest economic partner, neighbor and energy supplier, has proved to be an unprecedented case and has marked a new stage of development of the European foreign policy toolkit. Therefore, it seems relevant to investigate the process of coordination of positions of the European states on the imposition of anti-Russian sanctions and particular restrictive measures. The article is devoted to the distribution of roles in the process of the elaboration of the consolidated sanctions policy of the Western countries towards Russia in 2014. Methodology. The theoretical foundation of the study is the realist paradigm in its neoclassical version. The methodological basis includes the systemic method of the international relations analysis, comparative an evolutionary approaches. The data were analyzed with the method of traditional documents review, as well as the method of event-analysis of a particular case based on data clusterization on certain criteria. Results. The contemporary procedure specifics of collective decision-making on the issue of sanctions in the European Union are described. The distribution of roles and interests of the European states towards anti-Russian sanctions in early 2014 is reviewed. Germany’s leading position is analyzed in balancing between various stances of the European states and the USA and their polar views on economic issues. Conclusion. Germany’s chancellor Angela Merkel has proved to contribute the most into the elaboration of the middle-ground American-European position. On the one hand, she has tried to iron out the harsh American position, on the other hand, she has made great effort to achieve European consensus, and at the same time, she had to overcome domestic discrepancies.

About the Author

V. A. Silaeva
Ministry Of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Attache



References

1. Borovskij Ju.V. Trachuk K.V., 2015. Konceptual’nye i institucional’nye aspekty jenergeticheskoj politiki ES (1990- 2014) [Conceptual and institutional aspects of energy policy of the European Union (1990-2014)]. Vestnik MGIMOUniversiteta [The Herald of MGIMO-University]. №1 (40).

2. Vorotnikov V.V., 2016. 25 let nezavisimosti gosudarstv Baltii: iz Sovetskogo v Evropejskij Sojuz [25 years of independence of Baltic states: from the Soviet Union to the European Union]. Kontury global’nyh transformacij: politika, jekonomika, pravo [Configuration of Global Transformation: Politics, Economy, Law]. Vol. 9. Issue 5.

3. Zhurkin V.V., 2014. Voennaja politika Evrosojuza [Defense policy of the European Union]. Moscow.

4. Kaveshnikov N.Ju., 2013. Razvitie vneshnej jenergeticheskoj politiki Evropejskogo Sojuza [The development of external energy policy of the European Union]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [The Herald of MGIMO-University]. № 4.

5. Meden N.K., 2015. O nekotoryh tendencijah v oboronnoj politike Germanii [On certain tendencies in Germany’s defense policy]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [The Herald of MGIMO-University]. № 2 (41).

6. Pavlov N.V., 2017. Rossija i Germanija: nesostojavshijsja al’jans (istorija s prodolzheniem) [Russia and Germany: the failed alliance (to be continued)]. Moscow.

7. Romanova T., 2012. O neoklassicheskom realizme i sovremennoj Rossii [On neoclassical realism in modern Russia]. Rossija v global’noj politike [Russia in Global Policy]. № 3. URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru.

8. Salygin V.I., Kaveshnikov N.Ju., 2014. «Gazprom» na rynke Evrosojuza: neobhodim balans principov konkurencii i jenergeticheskoj bezopasnosti [«Gazprom» on the European Union market: the balance is needed between the principles of competition and energy security]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [The Herald of MGIMO-University]. № 4 (37).

9. Troickij M.A., 2004. Transatlanticheskij Sojuz. Modernizacija sistemy amerikano-evropejskogo partnerstva posle raspada bipoljarnosti. 1991-2004 [Transatlantic Union. Modernization of the system of American-European partnership after the collapse of bipolarity]. Moscow.

10. Shakleina T.A., 2012, 2017 (2-oe izdanie) Rossija i SShA v mirovoj politike [Russia and USA in World Politics]. Moscow.

11. Connectivity Wars. Why Migration, Finance and Trade are the Geo-economic Battlefields of the Future, edited by Mark Leonard. London, European Council on Foreign Relations. 2016.

12. Dempsy, Judy, 2014. After the Sanctions, a Strategy for the East. Carnegie Europe. August 18. URL: http:// carnegieeurope.eu.

13. Dempsy, Judy, 2014. Europe is Completely Divided Over How to Respond to Russia. Carnegie Europe. March. URL: http://carnegieeurope.eu.

14. Dempsy, Judy, 2014. Russia is losing Germany. Carnegie Europe. August 21. URL: http://carnegieeurope.eu.

15. Dempsy, Judy, 2014. The Curse of Russian Energy. Carnegie Europe. April 03. URL: http://carnegieeurope.eu.

16. Kreutz, Joakim, 2005. Hard Measures by a Soft Power? Sanctions Policy of the European Union 1981 – 2004. Bonn International Center for Conversion. URL: http://www.pcr.uu.se.

17. Speck, Ulrich, 2014. Merkel is Ready to Confront Putin. The Interpreter, March 27. URL: http://www.interpretermag. com.

18. Stokes, Bruce, 2015. Russia, Putin Held in Low Regard around the World. Pew Research Center, Global Attitudes and Trends, August 5. URL: http://www.pewglobal.org.


Review

For citations:


Silaeva V.A. BUILDING EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON ANTI-RUSSIAN SANCTIONS: ECONOMY VERSUS POLITICS. Journal of Law and Administration. 2017;(4):69-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2017-4-45-69-77

Views: 443


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)