Transformation of Organizational Structures of Industrial Enterprises in the Context of Industry 4.0 Development

Introduction. The article is devoted to the consideration of theoretical and methodological issues of the transition from traditional organizational structures of management of industrial enterprises to new forms of organizational structures demanded by the modern stage of technological development. The industrial development of the global economy and technological breakthroughs in production invariably become an impulse to change the management system of enterprises. Technologies are changing quite a lot in society, making more and more demands on the competencies of employees. Such transformations initiate shifts in the corporate culture of the enterprise, forcing owners and management to move away from the traditional management paradigm. The article attempts to generalize and systematize the existing organizational structures of industrial enterprises and identify trends in their transformation in the context of the development of Industry 4.0 in the context of digitalization in the knowledge management framework. Studies of organizational structures within the framework of the industrial development of the economy have been conducted and patterns of transformation of management mechanisms and paradigms have been identified. A fractal model of the organizational structure is proposed in the proposed evolutionary change in the management paradigm, which is gradually changing its targets in the context of social transformation.

Materials and methods. The research is based on materials from different years on the organizational and cultural transformation of business due to technological changes. General scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, and generalization are used. The experience of global business shows that these two factors are interconnected. Recent studies [30] of European enterprises show a different degree of receptivity of corporate culture and organizational management structure to innovative transformation related to Industry 4.0 technologies and digitalization of business processes.

Research results. The industrial development of the global economy and technological breakthroughs in production invariably become an impulse to change the management system of enterprises. This study shows the most diverse forms of organizational management structures, which nevertheless have a similar methodology within the framework of a single management paradigm. Technologies are changing quite a lot in society, making more and more demands on the competencies of employees involved in the entire life cycle of industrial products, which is inevitably reflected in the management paradigm.

Discussion and conclusion. On the threshold of the fourth industrial revolution, in addition to tectonic technological shifts, we expect no less grandiose organizational and managerial transformations in order to fully utilize the potential and advantages inherent in the new Industry 4.0 solutions.

1. Avdoshkin S.M., 2006. Sinergeticheskie organizacii v ekonomike XXI-go veka [Synergistic Organizations in the Economy of the XXI Century]. Izvestiya AIN im. A.M. Prohorova. Biznes-informatika. [Proceedings of AIN named after A.M. Prokhorov. Business Informatics]. Vol. 17. P. 155-163.

2. Adler Yu.P., Chernykh E.A., 2001. Znaniya i informaciya - eto ne odno i to zhe [Knowledge and Information are not the Same Thing]. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo [Information Society]. Issue 6. P. 8-15.

3. Akmaeva R.I., Lunev A.P., Mineva O.K., 2015. Razvitie menedzhmenta ot tradicionnoj sistemy upravleniya k samoobuchayushchimsya i samoupravlyaemym organizaciyam [Development of Management from Traditional Management System to Self-Learning and Self-Managing Organizations]. Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura [Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture]. No. 2 (43).

4. Vaisman E.D., Zagornaya T.O., Kolomytseva A.O., 2021. Modeli vizualizacii dannyh v slozhnyh sistemah: fraktal'no-orientirovannyj podhod, [Data visualization models in complex systems: a fractal-oriented approach]. Novoe v ekonomicheskoj kibernetike [New in Economic Cybernetics]. No. 2. P. 62-74.

5. Garaehagi D., 2022. Sistemnoe myshlenie. Kak upravlyat' haosom i slozhnymi processami. Platforma dlya modelirovaniya arhitektury biznesa [Systemic Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complex Processes. Business Architecture Modeling Platform]. Minsk.

6. Golubkin V.N., Kalenjyan S.O., Kleeva L.P., 2006. Tri podhoda k upravleniyu znaniyami v hode transformacii sovremennoj ekonomiki. [Three Approaches to Knowledge Management during Transformation of Modern Economy]. Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki [Problems of Modern Economics]. No. 6. P. 1002-1113.

7. Drobysheva V.G., 2014. Adaptivnaya organizacionnaya struktura kak vazhnejshij faktor konkurentnyh preimushchestv organizacii predprinimatel'skogo tipa [Adaptive organizational structure as a key factor of competitive advantages for an entrepreneurial organization type]. Social and Economic Phenomena and Processes. Vol. 9. No. 11. P. 63-70.

8. Klein N.V., Vorobiev V.I., 2024. Fraktal'no-dihotomicheskaya model' bazy znanij nechetkoj logiki. [Fractally-Dichotomous Knowledge Base Model of Fuzzy Logic]. BI-tekhnologii i korporativnye informacionnye sistemy v optimizacii biznes-processov cifrovoj ekonomiki: materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj ochno-zaochnoj konferencii. [BI Technologies and Corporate Information Systems in Optimization of Digital Economy Business Processes: Materials of XII International Scientific-Practical Conference with Participation by Correspondence]. Yekaterinburg, December 4. P. 43-55.

9. Lapidus V.A., 2008. Vseobshchee kachestvo (TQM) v rossijskih kompaniyah [Total Quality Management (TQM) in Russian Companies]. Nizhny Novgorod.

10. Massel’ L.V., 2016. Fraktal'nyj podhod k strukturirovaniyu znanij i primery ego primeneniya [Fractal Approach to Structuring Knowledge and Examples of Its Applications]. Ontologiya proektirovaniya [Ontology of Design]. Vol. 6. No. 2(20). P. 149- 161.

11. Massel' L.V., Erzhenin R.V., 2018. Primenenie fraktal'nogo podhoda pri postroenii stratificirovannoj modeli znanij ocenki effektivnosti slozhnyh sistem, Effektivnost' funkcionirovaniya slozhnyh system. [Application of Fractal Approach to [Building a Stratified Model for Evaluating Effectiveness of Complex Systems. Efficiency of Functioning of Complex Systems]. Reshetnikovskie chteniya [Reshetnikov Readings]. P. 357-358.

12. Monden Y., 2007. Sistema menedzhmenta Tojoty [Toyota's Management System]. Moscow.

13. Ohno T., 2018. Proizvodstvennaya sistema Tojoty. Uhodya ot massovogo proizvodstva [Toyota Production System. Beyond Large-Scale Production]. Moscow.

14. Ostapenko S.N., Filatov A.A., 2015. Sopostavitel'naya ocenka proizvoditel'nosti truda promyshlennyh predpriyatij OAO «Koncern PVO «Almaz – Antej» s analogichnymi zarubezhnymi kompaniyami [Comparative Assessment of Labor Productivity at Industrial Enterprises JSC Concern Air Defense “Almaz-Antey” Compared to Similar Foreign Companies]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State University]. No. 400. P. 245-252.

15. Porter M., Takeuti H., Sakakibara M., 2005. Yaponskaya ekonomicheskaya model': mozhet li Yaponiya konkurirovat'? [Japanese Economic model: Can Japan compete?]. Moscow.

16. Robertson J.B., 2020. Holakratiya. Revolyucionnyj podhod v menedzhmente [Holacracy. A Revolutionary Approach to Management]. Moscow.

17. Svistunov V.M., Lobachev V.V., Kuzina G.P., 2022. Neizbezhnost' transformacii korporativnoj kul'tury kompanii v usloviyah perekhoda na novye tekhnologii menedzhmenta [The inevitability of corporate culture transformation in the context of transition to new management technologies]. Upravlenie personalom i intellektual'nymi resursami v Rossii [Personnel Management and Intellectual Resources in Russia]. No. 1(58). P. 9-15.

18. Smelov V.Yu., Shper V.L., Khunuzidi E.I., Akhmetova E.A., Oleksenko Ya.G., 2022. Shuhart + Taguti vs kontrol' dopuskov: dva podhoda k ocenke kachestva [Shewhart + Taguchi vs tolerance control: two approaches to quality assessment]. Standarty i kachestvo [Standards and Quality].

19. Starikov E.N., Klejn N.V., Vorob'ev V.I., 2024. Ocenka effektivnosti promyshlennoj politiki v OPK na osnove nejrosetej na baze nechetkoj logiki [Evaluation of the effectiveness of industrial policy in the military-industrial complex based on neural networks based on fuzzy logic]. Cifrovye modeli i resheniya [Digital models and solutions]. Vol. 3. № 2. S. 43-54.

20. Taleb N.N., 2012. O sekretah ustojchivosti: Esse; Prokrustovo lozhe: Filosofskie i zhitejskie aforizmy. [On the Secrets of Resilience: Essays; Procrustean Bed: Philosophical and Practical Aphorisms]. Moscow.

21. Tkachenko I.N., Starikov E.N., 2020. Cifrovaya ekonomika: osnovnye trendy i zadachi razvitiya [Digital economy: main trends and development tasks]. Izv. Sarat. un-ta. Nov.ser. Ser. Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo [Izvestia. Saratov University. Nov. series. Series: Economics. Management. Law]. Vol. 20. Issue 3. S. 244-255.

22. Tuguskina G.N., Rozhkova L.V., Salnikova O.V., 2019. Upravlenie znaniyami v sovremennyh organizaciyah [Knowledge Management in Modern Organizations]. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Obshchestvennye nauki [Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Volga Region. Social Sciences]. No. 2(50). S. 210-218.

23. Chep'yuk O.R., 2020. Ekonomicheskaya bessub"ektnost' kak faktor degumanizacii social'nyh otnoshenij [Economic Subjectlessness as a Factor of Dehumanization in Social Relations]. Diss. na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora filosofskih nauk. [Diss. for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.]. Nizhny Novgorod.

24. Schwab K., 2021. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyuciya [The Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Moscow.

25. Shchepin E., 2019. VkusVill. VkusVil. Kak sovershit' revolyuciyu v ritejle, delaya vsyo ne tak [How to Revolutionize Retail by Doing Everything Differently]. Moscow.

26. Yushin V.N., 2010. Fraktaly i fraktalopodobnye struktury v nauke i obrazovanii [Fractals and Fractal-like Structures in Science and Education]. Obrazovanie i obshchestvo [Education and Society]. No. 3. P. 72-76.

27. Daoud J., Tarek M., 2023. The Evolving Landscape of Organizational Structures: A Contemporary Analysis (September 26). URL: https://ssrn.com.

28. Durst S., Edvardsson I.R., 2012. Knowledge management in SMEs: a literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 16 (6). P. 879-903.

29. Gouillart F.J., Kelly J.N., 1996. Transforming the Organization. Mcgraw-Hill.

30. Klyukina V., Bider I. and Perjons E., 2021. Does Fractal Enterprise Model Fit Operational Decision Making? Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2021). Vol. 2. P. 613-624.

31. Mohelska H., Sokolova M., 2018. Management approaches for industry 4.0 - the organizational culture perspective. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Vol. 24. Issue 6. P. 2225–2240.

32. Nonaka I., 1990. Redundant, Overlapping Organization: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process. California Management Review. Spring. P. 27-38.

33. Pfeffer, J., Sutton, R., 2000. The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge Into Action. Harvard Business School Press.

34. Riege A., 2005. Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 9 (3). P. 48-67.

35. Wallach E.J., 1983. Individuals and organizations: The cultural match. Training and Development Journal. No. 12. P. 28-36.