Preview

Journal of Law and Administration

Advanced search

Welfare state: defining the problem

https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-1-46-32-42

Abstract

Introduction. In the modern system of statebuilding the welfare state, as a concept, the genesis of which is associated with the need to resolve the aggravated social contradictions, is a fundamental principle, destined to determine the content of state policy. Notwithstanding the fact that the most comprehensive view of the welfare state concept was formed relatively recently, the description of certain features of the welfare state as a specific phenomenon of social life is seen in the works of philosophers and lawyers of various historical schools and eras. It allows us to conclude that the institution of state immanently has the characteristic of “welfare”. The dynamism of the social relations development entails the permanent search for new approaches to the welfare state and the constant appeal to this principle in order to get the full and comprehensive disclosure of the constitutional provisions and ensure their direct action.

Materials and methods. The theoretical basis of this work is the scientific works of philosophers and lawyers adhering to the legal positivism. The methodological basis of the research is the formal logical method, the method of system analysis, structural and functional method.

Results. This article is devoted to basic propositions of the welfare state legal analysis; it includes analysis of the essence of the welfare state concept based on positivistic understanding of law in various historic periods; this article also analyzes some aspects of the welfare state concept regarding human rights protection and constitutional review.

Discussion and conclusion. The principle of the welfare state is presented as the positive duty of the public authorities to ensure social and economic human rights and the balance of social interests. The implementation of the principle of the welfare state strongly depends on the constitutional review bodies’ activities, the main purpose of which is to specify the content of the relevant constitutional rules within the framework of specific social relations.

About the Author

A. A. Klishas
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Andrey Klishas, Doctor of Legal Science, Professor, Head of the Department of Theory of Law and State, Academic Advisor of the School of Law, Head of the Constitutional Legislation and State-Building Committee of the Council of the Federation


References

1. Austin, J., 1873. Vol 2: Lectures on Jurisprudence or The Philosophy of Positive Law. London: J. Murray.

2. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., Turner, B.S., 1999. Sotsiologicheskiy slovar [The Dictionary of Sociology]. Translated from English under the editorship of S. A. Yerofeyev. Moscow.

3. Bentham, J., 1998. Vvedeniye v osnovaniya nravstvennosti i zakonodatelstva [аn Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation]. [Kapustin, B. G., translation, foreword, comments]. Moscow.

4. Varlamova, N.V., 2009. Klassifikatsiya prav cheloveka: podkhody k probleme [Classification of Human Rights: Approaches to the Issue]. Sravnitelnoye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye [Comparative Constitutional Review]. No. 4 (71).

5. Gavrilova, Yu.V., 2016. Printsip sotsialnoy spravedlivosti v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Principle of Social Justice in Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Sotsialnaya spravedlivost i pravo: problemy teorii i praktiki: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Social Justice and Law: Theory and Practice. Materials of the International Practical Law Conference]. Editor-inChief: T. A. Soshnikova. Moscow.

6. Hobbes, T., 1991. Leviafan, ili Materiya, forma i vlast gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil]. Hobbes, T. Sochineniya [Works]: In 2 vol. V. 2. Мoscow.

7. Kashnikov, B.N., 2004. Liberalniye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii [Liberal Theories of Justice and Political Practice of Russia]. NovGu imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo. Velikiy Novgorod.

8. Kelsen, H., 1987. Chistoye ucheniye o prave Gansa Kelzena [Pure Theory of Law of Hans Kelsen: a compilation of translations]. Issue 1. Moscow.

9. Kniga pravitelya oblasti Shan [Book of Lord Shang]: translated from Chinese. Introduction by L. S. Perelomov; comments by L. S. Perelomov; afterword by L. S. Perelomov. Moscow, 1993.

10. Novgorodtsev, P.I., 1909. Krizis sovremennogo pravosoznaniya [Crisis of Modern Legal Consience]. Moscow.

11. O Svobode. Antologiya mirovoy liberalnoy mysli [On Freedom. An Anthology of Global Liberal Thought] (1st Half of the 20th Century). Moscow, 2000.

12. Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik [Issues of the General Theory of Law and State]. Under the general editorship of V.S. Nersesyants.

13. Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik [Issues of the General Theory of Law and State: Textbook]. Under the general editorship of V.S. Nersesyants. Moscow, 2014.

14. Radbruch, G., 2004. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of Law]. Moscow.

15. Hoeffe, O., 1994. Politika. Pravo. Spravedlivost. Osnovopolozheniya kriticheskoy filosofii prava i gosudarstva [Political Justice: Foundations for a Critical Philosophy of Law and the State]. Translated by Vl. S. Malakhov with the help of Ye. V. Malakhova. Moscow.


Review

For citations:


Klishas A.A. Welfare state: defining the problem. Journal of Law and Administration. 2018;(1):32-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-1-46-32-42

Views: 1593


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5736 (Online)