Theory of state and law on legal influence
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-1-46-43-53
Abstract
Introduction. The article analyzes the legal impact as a systemic structure. The main emphasis is on the possibility of its recognition as an artificially natural open complex system, which requires revision of the theoretical and legal concepts of the phenomenon under study, its structure and the place in the theory of state and law.
Materials and methods. The methodological research is based on general scientific and special methods of knowledge of legal impact as a system, including analysis, synthesis, analogy, generalization, comparison. The use of the system approach allowed revealing the dynamic nature of the legal impact, the element-by-element nature of changes in the legal system and in society.
Results of the study. The identification of a special quality of legal impact – its system, requires the use of systematic methodology. In this case, there is an opportunity to reveal the potential of legal impact, taking into account not only its normative core, but also the multi-factor interaction with the external environment, culture, socio-economic reality, forms of legal and psychological impact.
The arguments in favor of a systematic approach in the theory of state and law, without denying the instrumental approach, contain statements about the interdisciplinary nature of the legal impact, new opportunities for a detailed study of the intensive relationships and interactions between its elements as a system, to approach the solution of problems about the composition and legal nature of such elements.
Discussion and conclusion. In theoretical and practical studies of the nature of legal impact, it is important to find and characterize its complex system levels, series and elements in a timely manner, which expands the horizons of not only its understanding, but also increases efficiency through the expansion of forms of legal impact in the improvement of national legislation. In this context, further research on the theory of state and law is extremely necessary: the study and description of the legal statics, the dynamics of the legal system, their methodological justification give a new impetus to the representation of legal reality experiencing dynamic changes.
About the Author
L. N. BergRussian Federation
Lyudmila N. Berg, Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for Scientific Research
References
1. Alekseev, S.S., 2002. Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniia [Climb to the right. Searches and solutions]. Moscow.
2. Alekseev, S.S., 1998. Pravo. Azbuka. Teoriia. Filosofiia. Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniia [Right. ABC. Theory. Philosophy. Experience in complex research]. Moscow.
3. Alekseev, S.S., 1974. Sovetskoe pravo kak sistema: metodologicheskie printsipy issledovaniia [Soviet law as a system: the methodological principles of research]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet state and law]. № 6.
4. Alekseev, S.S., 1975. Struktura sovetskogo prava [The structure of Soviet law]. Moscow.
5. Altukhov, B.L., 1986. Vysshie formy razvitiia – kliuch k ponimaniiu drugikh ego form [Higher forms of development – the key to understanding its other forms]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy]. № 3.
6. Afanas’ev, V.G., 1981. Sistemnost’, poznanie i upravlenie [Systematic, knowledge and management]. Moscow.
7. Baranov, P.P., 1997. Teoriia sistem i sistemnyi analiz pravosoznaniia lichnogo sostava organov vnutrennikh del [Theory of systems and systems analysis of the legal awareness of the personnel of law enforcement agencies]. Rostov-na-Donu.
8. Blauberg, I.V., Iudin, E.G., 1973. Stanovlenie i sushchnost’ sistemnogo podkhoda [Formation and essence of the system approach]. Moscow.
9. Buritsa, M., 1988. Genezis i evoliutsiia strukturnogo podkhoda v nauchnom poznanii [Genesis and evolution of the structural approach in scientific cognition]. Dialektika. Poznanie. Nauka [Dialectics. Cognition. Science]. Lektorsky V.A., Tiukhtin B.C. (eds.). Moscow.
10. Vdovin, I.A., 2002. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniia investitsionnoi deiatel’nosti (istoricheskii i teoretiko-pravovoi analiz): Dis. ... d-ra iurid. nauk [The mechanism of legal regulation of investment activity (historical and theoretical and legal analysis): Dr. of juridical sciences thesis]. Saint-Petersburs.
11. Evgrafov, P.B., 1989. Problemy teorii sistemy sovetskogo prava [Problems of the theory of the system of Soviet law]. Khar’kov.
12. Kerimov, D.A., 1972. Filosofskie problemy prava [Philosophical problems of law]. Moscow.
13. Kudriavtsev, Iu.V., 1981. Normy prava kak sotsial’naia informatsiia [Rule of law as social information]. Moscow.
14. Kuz’menko, A.V., 2003. «Sistemnyi vzgliad» na sistemu prava [“Systemic view” on the system of law]. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence]. № 3.
15. Kurdiuk, G.P., But’ko, L.V., 2004. Otrasl’ prava: evoliutsionirovanie i perspektivy [Branch of Law: evolution and prospects]. Krasnodar.
16. Lenchik, V.A., 2002. Mekhanizm deistviia prava: Dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [The mechanism of the law: candidate of juridical sciences thesis]. Moscow.
17. Livshits, R.Z., 2001. Teoriia prava: Uchebnik [Theory of Law: Textbook]. Moscow.
18. Malakhov, V.P., 2004. Pravosoznanie: priroda, soderzhanie, logika [Legal awareness: nature, content, logic]. Moscow.
19. Miroshnik, S.V., 2003. Teoriia pravovogo stimulirovaniia: Dis. ... d-ra iurid. nauk [The theory of legal stimulation: Dr. of juridical sciences thesis]. Rostov-na-Donu.
20. Motroshilovа N.V. (ed.), 1990. Nauka i budushchee: bor’ba idei [Science and the future: the struggle of ideas]. Moscow.
21. Kochergin A.N. (ed.), 1990. Nauka i ee mesto v kul’ture [Science and its place in culture]. Novosibirsk.
22. Osipov, M.Iu., 2010. Pravovye protsessy i ikh effektivnost’ [Legal processes and their effectiveness]. Moscow.
23. Petrov, D.E., 2001. Otrasl’ prava: Avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Branch of law: an auto-abstract of a candidate of juridical sciences thesis]. Saratov.
24. Vasil’ev, A.M. (ed.) Pravovaia sistema sotsializma: v 2-kh kn. [The legal system of socialism: in 2 books]. Kn. 1: Poniatie, struktura, sotsial’nye sviazi [Book. 1: Concept, structure, social connections]. Moscow, 1986. Kn. 2: Funktsionirovanie i razvitie [Book. 2: Functioning and development]. Moscow, 1987.
25. Rabinovich, V.M., 1988. Problemy ponimaniia v pravovom regulirovanii [Problems of Understanding in Legal Regulation]. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence]. № 5.
26. Rad’ko, T.N., 1971. Sistemnyi analiz pravovogo regulirovaniia [System analysis of legal regulation]. Trudy Volgogradskoi vysshei sledstvennoi shkoly [Proceedings of the Volgograd Higher Investigative School]. Vol. 4. Volgograd.
27. Rogov, D.I., 2003. Mekhanizm grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniia otnoshenii, voznikaiushchikh po povodu chesti, delovoi reputatsii i dobrogo imeni grazhdan: Dis. … kand. iurid nauk [The mechanism of civil-law regulation of relations arising from the honor, business reputation and good citizenship: candidate of juridical sciences thesis]. Ekaterinburg.
28. Sadovskii, V.N., 1974. Osnovaniia obshchei teorii sistem [Foundations of the general theory of systems]. Moscow.
29. Sapun, V.A., 1988. Mekhanizm realizatsii sovetskogo prava [The mechanism of the implementation of Soviet law]. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence]. № 1.
30. Saratovskii, V.N., 1980. Sistemnaia deiatel’nost’ i ee filosofskoe osmyslenie [Systemic activity and its philosophical comprehension]. Sistemnye issledovaniia. Ezhegodnik [System researches. Yearbook].
31. Selin, M.I., 2015. Teoreticheskie problemy pravovogo regulirovaniia mer presecheniia v rossiiskom prave: Dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Theoretical problems of legal regulation of preventive measures in the Russian law: candidate of juridical sciences thesis]. Saint-Petersburg.
32. Syrykh, V.M., 1970. Struktura, genezis, sistema kak elementy istoricheskogo i logicheskogo metodov poznaniia prava: Avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Structure, genesis, system as elements of historical and logical methods of cognition of law: an auto-abstract of a candidate of juridical sciences thesis]. Moscow.
33. Tiunova, L.B., 1991. Sistemnye sviazi pravovoi deistvitel’nosti [Systemic links of legal reality]. Saint-Petersburg.
34. Uemov, A.I., 1978. Sistemnyi podkhod i obshchaia teoriia sistem [The system approach and the general theory of systems]. Moscow.
35. Shabalin, V.A., 1969. Sistemnyi analiz mekhanizma pravovogo regulirovaniia [System analysis of the mechanism of legal regulation]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet state and law]. № 10.
36. Shabanov, V.A., 1969. Sistemnyi analiz pravovogo regulirovaniia [System analysis of legal regulation]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet state and law]. № 10.
37. Iakutova, M.A., 2004. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniia mezhbiudzhetnykh otnoshenii gosudarstva i munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [The mechanism of legal regulation of interbudgetary relations of the state and municipal formations in the Russian Federation: candidate of juridical sciences thesis]. Moscow.
38. Iambushev, F.Sh., 2002. Pravovoe soznanie v mekhanizme pravovogo regulirovaniia obshchestvennykh otnoshenii: Dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Legal consciousness in the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations: candidate of juridical sciences thesis]. Novgorod.
39. Aidarhanova, K.N., Kabanbayeva, G.B., Kuderin, I.K., Ermukhametova, S.R., Omarova, A.B., 2014. Place of currency law in the system of law. Life Science Journal. Vol. 11. Is. 4.
40. Arnold, N.S., 2000. Postmodern liberalism and the expressive function of law. Social Philosophy and Policy. Vol. 17. Is. 1.
41. Burge-Hendrix, B., 2009. The Educative Function of Law. Law and Philosophy. Oxford.
42. de Vries, M.S., 2002. The changing functions of laws and its implication for government and governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 68. Is. 4.
43. Harlow, S.D., 2004. Science-Based Trade Disputes: A New Challenge in Harmonizing the Evidentiary Systems of Law and Science. Risk Analysis. Vol. 24. Is. 2.
44. Hu, X., 2010. When American law meets Chinese law eye to eye: How two legal systems approach the duty to protect. Global Jurist. Vol. 10. Is. 2.
45. Kamto, M., 2011. The Function of Law and the Codification of International Law in a Changing World. From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma. Oxford.
46. Kedar, Y., Hon, G., 2017. Roger Bacon (c. 1220-1292) and his system of laws of nature: Classification, hierarchy and significance. Perspectives on Science. Vol. 25. Is. 6.
47. Keller, W.H., Zhang, X., 2017. Functions of law in the sustainable development of China and a model for environmental legislation. European Business Review. Vol. 29. Is. 4.
48. Killion, M.U., 2010. The function of law in habermas’ modern society. Global Jurist. Vol. 10. Is. 2. Art. 1.
49. Kjaer, P.F., 2015. The emergence of governance and the function of law. Evolutionary Governance Theory: Theory and Applications. Cham.
50. McCloud, N., Delgado, M.S., Holmes, C., 2018. Does a stronger system of law and order constrain the effects of foreign direct investment on government size? European Journal of Political Economy. Article in Press.
51. Nobes, C., Roberts, A., 2000. Towards a unifying model of systems of law, corporate financing, accounting and corporate governance. Australian Accounting Review. Vol. 10. Is. 20.
52. Nobles, R., Schiff, D., 2013. Structural coupling between the systems of law and the media: The contrasting examples of criminal conviction and criminal appeal. Law and Intersystemic Communication: Understanding ‘Structural Coupling’. Burlington.
53. Quataert, J.H., 2010. The gendering of human rights in the international systems of law in the twentieth century. Essays on Twentieth-Century History. Philadelphia.
54. Shiffman, M.A., 2002. Comparing systems of law internationally. International Journal of Cosmetic Surgery and Aesthetic Dermatology. Vol. 4. Is. 1.
55. Van Der Burg, W., 2001. The expressive and communicative functions of law, especially with regard to moral issues.Law and Philosophy. Vol. 20. Is. 1.
56. Waluchow, W.J., 2008. Legality, Morality, and the Guiding Function of Law. The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford.
57. Waser, M.R., 2015. Designing, Implementing and Enforcing a Coherent System of Laws, Ethics and Morals for Intelligent Machines (Including Humans). Procedia Computer Science. Vol. 71.
58. Torkunov A.V. Rossiiskaia model’ demokratii i sovremennoe global’noe upravlenie [A Russian Model of Democracy and Modern Global Governance]. Kontseptsii i opredeleniia demokratii: antologiia [Concepts and Definitions of Democracy: Anthology]. Moscow, 2006. Torkunov A.V. Po doroge v budushchee [On the Road to the Future]. Red.sost. Mal’gin A.V., Chechevishnikov A.L. Moscow, 2010.
59. di Robert V. Yengibaryan., 2014. Time chooses us, we choose everything else… Democrazia e diritto [Democracy and Law]. № 4.
Review
For citations:
Berg L.N. Theory of state and law on legal influence. Journal of Law and Administration. 2018;(1):43-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-1-46-43-53