China’s stance towards the applicability of the common heritage of mankind governance regime to the Arctic
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-2-47-13-21
Abstract
Introduction. The article provides an analysis of China’s tough stance towards the applicability of the governance regime of the common heritage of mankind to the Arctic referring to the Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982, in the general context of contemporary international law.
Materials and methods. General scientific and private scientific methods of cognition constitutes the methodological basis for the study.
Results of the study. In the course of the study the author concludes that China’s current stance towards the governance regime of the International seabed area as the common heritage of mankind and towards the international maritime law as a whole should not have exclusively negative assessments as it was during the period of the confrontation between the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China in 1960-1980. Objectively the long-term interests of the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation in the maintenance of international maritime law are aligned. However, a contemporary legal policy of China differs from the policy stated at the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. It became more focused on the promotion of China’s national interests in the Arctic, on the creation of the Area of the common heritage of mankind in the Arctic Ocean, even though none of the Arctic Coastal State advocate this stance.
Conclusions. In this article the author balances China’s arguments in favour of applicability of norms of the international law related to the common heritage of mankind to the Arctic with the Arctic Coastal States’ arguments against it according to the doctrine in the sphere of the international law in which the legal concept of the common heritage of mankind is clarified. The author reveals reasons of China’s support of the concept of the common heritage of mankind initiated by the USA and China’s effort to broadly interpret it especially towards the Arctic in terms of the Arctic Coastal States’ stance towards this issue contained in the materials of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (1973 – 1982).
About the Author
E. V. KienkoRussian Federation
Elena V. Kienko
References
1. Barsegov, Ju.G., Korzun, V.A., Mogilevkin, I.M., 2002. Arktika: interesy Rossii i mezhdunarodnye uslovija ih realizacii [The Arctic: interests of Russia and international conditions of their realization]. Moscow.
2. Vylegzhanin, A.N., 2001. Morskie prirodnye resursy (Mezhdunarodno-pravovoj rezhim) [Marine natural resources (international legal regime)]. Moscow.
3. Vylegzhanin, A.N., 2003. Morskoe dno za predelami nacional’noj jurisdikcii [Seabed beyond national jurisdiction]. Mezhdunarodnoe morskoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie [the International Law: handbook]. Edited by Gureev S.A. Moscow.
4. Vylegzhanin, A. N., 2013. Pravovoe polozhenie Arkticheskogo regiona v dokumentah [Legal regime of the Arctic region in documents]. Arkticheskij region: problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [The Arctic region: international cooperation issues]. Vol. 3. Rossijskij sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam [Russian International Affairs Council ]. Edited by Ivanov, I.S., Aspekt Press, Moscow, 663 s.
5. Vylegzhanin, A. N., 2013. Predlozhenija k dorozhnoj karte razvitija mezhdunarodno-pravovyh osnov sotrudnichestva Rossii v Arktike: rabochaja tetrad’ [Proposals to the road map on the international legal basis development of Russia’s cooperation in the Arctic]. Rossijskij sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam [Russian International Affairs Council]. Edited by Ivanov I.S. Moscow.
6. Vojtolovskij, G.K., 2005.Dinamika razvitija [Dinamic of development]. Moscow.
7. Gureev, S.A., 2005. O neobhodimosti podtverzhdenija i pravovogo zakreplenija iskljuchitel’nyh prav Rossii v Arktike [About the necessity of reaffirmation and legal ensuring of Russia’s rights in the Arctic]. Edited by Gureev, S. A., Bunik, I. V. Sovet Federacii Federal’nogo Sobranija Rossijskoj Federacii. Morskaja dejatel’nost’ Rossijskoj Federacii: sostojanie i problemy zakonodatel’nogo obespechenija [the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Maritime activities of the Russian Federation: state and issues of regulatory framework]. Moscow.
8. Zhudro I.S., 2016. Jevoljucija mezhdunarodno-pravovogo rezhima Severnogo Ledovitogo okeana i nacional’nye interesy Rossii [Evolution of the international legal regime of the Arctic Ocean and national interests of Russia]. Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. № 2.
9. Ljubimov L.L., Roginko A.Ju., Vojtolovskij G.K., 1986. Mirovoj okean: jekonomika i politika: Mezhdunarodnye problemy osvoenija [the Oceans: the economy and the policy: international development issues]. Edited by Primakov E.M. In-t mirovoj jekonomiki i mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij AN SSSR [the Institute of World Economy and International Relations]. Moscow.
10. Stepanov E.D., 1980. Jekspansija Kitaja na more [China’s expansion on the Sea]. Moscow.
11. Boening A., Kremer J.-F., Loon A., 2013. Global Power Europe. Policies, Actions and Influence of the EU’s External Relations. Springer Science & Business Media. Vol. 2.
12. Depledge D., 2017. The Circumpolar Arctic. Britain and the Arctic. Springer.
13. Ostreng W., Eger K. M., Fløistad B., Jørgensen-Dahl A., Lothe L., Mejlænder-Larsen M., Wergeland T., 2013. Shipping in Arctic Waters: A comparison of the Northeast, Northwest and Trans Polar Passages. Springer Science & Business Media.
14. Peng J., Wegge N., 2014. China and the law of the sea: implications for Arctic governance. The Polar Journal. Vol. 4. No 2.
15. Xiangxin Xu, Guobin Zhang, Guifang (Julia) Xue, 2017. China’s Deep Seabed Law: Towards «Reasonably Appropriate» Environmental Legislation for Exploration and Exploitation of Deep Sea Minerals in the Area. Asian Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 21.
16. Zhiguo Gao, Myron H. Nordquist, Tommy Thong Bee Koh, John Norton Moore, 2009. China and the Law of the Sea. Freedom of Seas, Passage Rights and the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
17. Torkunov A.V. Rossiia v izmeniaiushcheisia geometrii sovremennogo mira [Russia in the Variable Geometry of the Modern World]. Nauchnye problemy natsional’noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Scientific Issues of National Security of the Russian Federation]. Vol. 4. Moscow, 2007. Torkunov A.V. Po doroge v budushchee [On the Road to the Future]. Red.-sost. Mal’gin A.V., Chechevishnikov A.L. Moscow, 2010.
18. Torkunov A.V. Novaia Rossiia v novom mire [New Russia in The New World]. Vstupitel’naia stat’ia k izdaniiu: Vneshniaia politika i bezopasnost’ sovremennoi Rossii. 1991-2002: Khrestomatiia: V 4 tomakh [Introductory Article for the Edition: Foreign Policy and Security of Modern Russia]. Predsedatel’ red. kollegii [Chief of the Editorial Board] A.V. Torkunov; sost. T.A. Shakleina. T. I. Moscow, 2002. Torkunov A.V. Po doroge v budushchee [On the Road to the Future]. Red.-sost. Mal’gin A.V., Chechevishnikov A.L. Moscow, 2010.
19. Torkunov A.V. Rossiiskaia model’ demokratii i sovremennoe global’noe upravlenie [A Russian Model of Democracy and Modern Global Governance]. Kontseptsii i opredeleniia demokratii: antologiia [Concepts and Definitions of Democracy: Anthology]. Moscow, 2006. Torkunov A.V. Po doroge v budushchee [On the Road to the Future]. Red.sost. Mal’gin A.V., Chechevishnikov A.L. Moscow, 2010.
Review
For citations:
Kienko E.V. China’s stance towards the applicability of the common heritage of mankind governance regime to the Arctic. Journal of Law and Administration. 2018;(2):13-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-2-47-13-21