Revolutions of 1917 in Russia and the history of the advocacy
https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-2-47-88-97
Abstract
Introduction. The aim of this article is the analysis of the reforming of the Bar association, which arose after the February and October revolutions in Russia. The fact that both the Interim Government and the Government of Bolsheviks attended to the issue of the Bar’s future immediately after the take-over highlights the importance of the Bar association for the state. The Interim Government formed a sub-commission on revision of the Statute of the Bar association, and a draft law on developing independent legal profession was prepared. The Council of People’s Commissars of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) passed a decree “On the Law” № 1 on 24 November 1917 which abolished the Bar association without any substitution. Different provisions and decrees concerning the legal profession, which were adopted up until 1922, is evidence of chaos of law in the country. Finally, the All-Russia Central Executive Committee of the RSFSR passed “The Statute on Advocacy” in 1922 which lasted until 1939. With the guidelines of this Statute the Bar association was subordinated to the state. In the time of repressive measures the association was not able to exercise its main function, it was not allowed to participate in either investigation or in trials regarding repressed people. Only in 1939 with the guideline of “the Statute on Advocacy of the USSR” the colleges of advocates became relatively self-regulative, they were given the rights of legal entities, the word “advocate” came back to practice. Time passed. The state regulation of the Bar association loosened gradually. “The Statute on Advocacy of the RSFSR” of 1962 considerably expanded the rights of an advocate, colleges of advocates were recognized as a voluntary association of individuals who practice advocacy. In 1970-1980 improvements the institution of legal profession weres sought for, Article 161 on colleges of advocates was included in the Constitution of the USSR in 1977. “The Statute on Advocacy of the RSFSR” of 1980 contained principles of international acts. After the breakup of the USSR the so-called paralleled colleges of advocates functioned along with the traditional Bar association, and energetic efforts were made to develop a new line in advocacy. It resulted in the Federal Law “On Legal Practice and Advocacy in the Russian Federation” adopted by the State Duma of Russia on 26 April 2002. The advocate was recognized as an independent professional legal counsel. Interference in the legal practice, carried out in compliance with the law, and impediment to this practice were prohibited.
Materials and methods. The materials for the research are the works of national and foreign researchers in the field of the Russian Law, legislative acts of the 20th century of Russia and the USSR. The methodological background of the research is based on the general philosophical and specific juridical methods of development of knowledge in the sphere of establishing the national advocacy, method of comparative analysis and method of legal history analysis.
Results of the research. The results of the scientific research allows making the following conclusion: in the world where the rule of law is infringed upon and the rule of arbitrariness prevails, where there is no lawyer there is no justice.
Discussion and conclusions. The indispensability of independence of a lawyer and the Bar association is proved, advocacy can only function in a stable society; advocacy cannot act as a legal institution in the conditions of a legal chaos. Advocacy is a means of salvation of a state from the internal decay. The state should take care of advocacy and guarantee the independence of a advocate.About the Author
V. D. SysoevRussian Federation
Vyacheslav Sysoev, Lecturer with the Advocacy Department, MGIMO-University under the MFA of Russia, Co-chairman of the Union of Literary Workers of the RF, Honorary Attorney of Russia
References
1. Sobranie otechestvennyh normativno-pravovyh istochnikov XI-XXI vekov po istorii advokatury [Collected national regulatory legal sources of 20-21 centuries on the History of Advocacy] Contributors: A.A.Klishin, A.A.Shugaev, A.V.Sysoev, V.D.Sysoev. Moscow, 2005.
2. Ezhenedel’nik Sovetskoj yusticii [Weekly Soviet Justice].№ 46-47. 1922.
3. Materialy NKYU RSFSR [Materials of People’s Commissariat of Justice of RSFSR]. Editions 1-5, Moscow, 1918.
4. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij [Complete Works]. Moscow, 1977.
5. Tsukov E.A., 2008. Filosofskie aspekty pravozashchitnoj deyatel’nosti v istorii gosudarstva rossijskogo [Philosophical Aspects of Advocacy in the History of the State of Russia]. Moscow.
6. Barschevskiy M.Yu., 1997. Organizaciya i deyatel’nost’ advokatury v Rossii [Organization and Activities of the Bar Association in Russia]. Moscow.
7. Zvyagintsev A.G., 2012. Zakonoblyustiteli [Guardians of the Law]. Moscow.
8. Shahray S.M., Krakovskiy K.P., 2014. Sud skoryj, pravyj, milostivyj i ravnyj dlya vsekh [Quick, Fair, Merciful and Equal for All Trial]. Moscow.
9. SU Vremennogo pravitel’stva. 1917 [Code of Justice of the Provisional Government. 1917]. № 132.
10. Skripilov E.A., 1970. Karatel’naya deyatel’nost’ Vremennogo pravitel’stva i apparat ee provedeniya [Punitory Activities of the Provisional Government and the Machinery of their Practice]. Moscow.
11. Kurskiy D.I., 1948. Izbrannye stat’i i rechi [Selected Articles and Speeches]. Moscow.
12. Na sluzhbe zakonu i spravedlivosti. Ocherki ob otechestvennyh ministrah yusticii (1802-2002). 2002 [On Service to Law and Justice. Documentaries on National Ministers of Justice(1802-2002)]. Assistant Editor, Contributor V.D. Sysoev. Moscow.
13. Pashukanis E., 1930. Polozhenie na teoreticheskom fronte (K nekotorym itogam diskussii) [On Some Results of the Discussion]. The Soviet State and the Revolution of Law. № 11-12.
14. XV s”ezd VKP(b). Stenograficheskij otchet [15th Congress of the Communist Soviet Party. Congressional Records]. Moscow, 1928.
15. Reforma sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa [Reform of the Soviet Criminal Trial]. Revolution of Law. № 2. 1928.
16. Sysoev V.D., 2003. Na sluzhbe rossijskoj yusticii. Ocherk o vidnom otechestvennom yuriste V.I.Terebilove [On Service to Russian Justice. Documentary on prominent national lawyer V.I.Terebilov]. Moscow.
17. Dekrety Sovetskoj vlasti [Decrees of the Soviet Government]. Vol. IV. Moscow, 1968.
18. Kredov S.A., 2011. Shchyolokov [Schyolokov]. Moscow.
19. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnyh stran [History of State and Law on Foreign Countries]. Part 2. Moscow, 2001.
20. Prokurory [Prosecutors]. Moscow, 1996.
21. Sobranie zakonov i rasporyazhenij Raboche-krest’yanskogo pravitel’stva SSSR za 1934 g. [Collected Laws and Orders of the USSR Workers’-Peasants’ Government of 1934]. Moscow, 1948.
22. Vaskovskiy E.V., 1893. Organizaciya advokatury. Сh. I. Ocherk vseobshchej istorii advokatury [Ogranization of the Bar Association, Part I. Documentary on History of Advocacy]. Part I. S.Petersburg.
23. Gessen I.V., 1914. Istoriya russkoj advokatury, t.I. Advokatura, obshchestvo i gosudarstvo [History of the Russian Bar Association, Vol.I. Advocacy, society and state]. Moscow.
24. Koni A.F., 1989. Vospominaniya o pisatelyah [Recollected Writers]. Moscow.
25. Torkunov A.V. Istoricheskii opyt Oktiabr’skoi revoliutsii [Historic Experience of the October Revolution]. Politicheskii klass [Political Class]. 2007. № 36. Torkunov A.V. Po doroge v budushchee [On the Road to the Future]. Red.-sost. Mal’gin A.V., Chechevishnikov A.L. Moscow, 2010.
26. Berezko V.E., 2016. Liberal’nye mery i sil’naia vlast’ [Liberal Measures and Strong Power]. Gosudarstvennaia vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie [State Power and Local Self-Government]. № 7.
27. Berezko V.E., 2016. Filosofskoe osmyslenie upravleniya gosudarstvom [Philosophic Comprehension of Governing a State]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek [Journal of Law and Administration]. № 1 (38).
Review
For citations:
Sysoev V.D. Revolutions of 1917 in Russia and the history of the advocacy. Journal of Law and Administration. 2018;(2):88-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-2-47-88-97