Genesis and progression of obligations, arising from unjust enrichment: comparative law research

Introduction. The article presents a comparative legal analysis of the genesis of the institution of obligations arising from unjust enrichment in countries belonging to different legal families. English and American law as vivid examples of the precedent system of law were chosen for comparison. The comparative research revealed the general and special features of the institution under study, as well as the trends in its functioning and development.

Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the research consists of the general scientific and special methods of cognition of legal phenomena and processes in the sphere of international private law: the method of the system-structural analysis; the method of synthesis of social and legal phenomena; the comparative legal method; the formal-logical method; the historical method and others.

Results of the study. The results of the research revealed that the institution of obligations arising from unfounded enrichment was embodied in the 20th century in the laws of Russia, the UK and the USA, but still remains at the stage of active development. Formation of the unjust enrichment institution was based in the named countries on the same

principles borrowed from Roman law. This approach made a basis for uniformity in the definition of the concept and the actual composition of the unjust enrichment institution. A significant difference in functioning of the unjust enrichment institution was revealed in the mechanism of rights protection.

Discussion and conclusion. The institution of obligations arising from the unjust enrichment is a unique institute of civil law that provides for the fullest realization of a person’s right to protection. This legal institution continues to develop, to which the study of its genesis and a foreign experience contributes immensely.

1. Bartoshek M., 1989. Rimskoe pravo (ponjatie, terminy, opredelenija) [Roman law (concept, terms, definitions)]. Moscow.

2. Grimm D.D., 2003. Lekcii po dogme rimskogo prava [Lectures on the dogma of Roman law]. Moscow.

3. Zakony grazhdanskie s razjasnenijami Pravitel’stvujushhego Senata i kommentarijami russkih juristov [Civil laws with explanations of the Governing Senate and comments of Russian lawyers]. Comp. I.M. Tyutryumov. Moscow: Statut. Book 2. 1990.

4. Ivanchak A.I., 2011. Pravovoj mehanizm zashhity prav uchastnikov grazhdanskogo oborota i ego reglamentacija v mezhdunarodnyh aktah: k voprosu ob unifikacii ponjatij. Zashhita prav i interesov uchastnikov grazhdanskogo oborota [The legal mechanism for the protection of the rights of participants in civil commerce and its regulation in the international instruments: the study of the unification of concepts. Protection of the rights and interests of participants in civil commerce]. Edited by V.P. Ocheredko. Saint-Petersburg.

5. Ivanchak A.I., 2011. Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii [Civil Law of the Russian Federation]. SaintPetersburg.

6. Novak D.V., 2010. Neosnovatel’noe obogashhenie v grazhdanskom prave [Unjust enrichment in civil law]. Moscow.

7. Pahman S.V., 2003. Obychnoe grazhdanskoe pravo v Rossii [Ordinary civil law in Russia]. Moscow.

8. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo [Roman private law]. Edited by I.B. Novitsky, I.S. Peretersky. Moscow, 2010.

9. Cvajgert K., Ketc H., 2011. Sravnitel’noe chastnoe pravo [Comparative private law]. Moscow.

10. Shershеnevich G.F., 1995. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook of Russian civil law]. Moscow.

11. A Dictionary of Law (Oxford Quick Reference). Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2013.

12. Gallo P., 1992. Unjust Enrichment: A Comparative Analysis. The American Journal of Comparative Law. Vol. 40.

13. Goff R., Jones G., 1966. The Law of Restitution. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

14. Mitchell Ch., Swadling W., 2013. The Restatement Third: Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

15. Neyers J.W., Pitel S.G., 2003. Understanding Unjust Enrichment. Portland: Hart Publishing.

16. Palmer G.E., 1989. History of Restitution in Anglo-American Law. International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. X. Restitution – Unjust Enrichment and Negotiorum Gestio. Tubingen, Ch. 3.

17. Posner R.A., 1998. Economic Analysis of Law. Aspen Publishers.

18. Seavey W.A., Scott A.W., 1938. Restitution. 213 Law Q. Rev. Cambridge University Press.